People v. Figueroa
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Citation | People v. Figueroa, 38 AD3d 796, 833 N.Y.S.2d 528, 2007 NY Slip Op 2575 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007) |
| Decision Date | 20 March 2007 |
| Docket Number | 2005-02262. |
| Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAYMOND FIGUEROA, Appellant. |
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
On appeal, the defendant contends that the police did not have probable cause on December 11, 2003 to pull over the vehicle in which he was a passenger. Thus, the defendant contends that the court erred in denying that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence. Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant adequately preserved this issue for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]).
However, as the People correctly contend, the police were not required to have "probable cause" that a crime had been committed in order to pull over the vehicle in which the defendant was a passenger. "It is fundamental that in order to stop a vehicle the police must have a `reasonable suspicion', based on objective evidence, that the occupants were involved in a felony or...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
People v. Bailey
...a reasonable suspicion, based on objective evidence, that the occupants were involved in a felony or misdemeanor" ( People v. Figueroa, 38 A.D.3d 796, 797, 833 N.Y.S.2d 528 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v. Coleman, 183 A.D.2d 840, 841, 584 N.Y.S.2d 89 ; see also People v. H......
-
People v. Floyd
...a reasonable suspicion, based on objective evidence, that the occupants were involved in a felony or misdemeanor" ( People v. Figueroa, 38 A.D.3d 796, 797, 833 N.Y.S.2d 528 [internal quotation marks omitted] ). "Unlike a tip from a known informant whose reputation can be assessed and who ca......
-
People v. Vasquez
...believe that the occupants of the vehicle were involved in the commission of a felony or misdemeanor (see People v. Figueroa , 38 A.D.3d 796, 797, 833 N.Y.S.2d 528 [2nd Dept. 2007] ).The defendant argues that the People have failed to establish that the police had reasonable suspicion to se......
-
People v. Ahmad
...suspicion," based on objective evidence, that the occupants were involved in a felony or misdemeanor’ " ( People v. Figueroa, 38 A.D.3d 796, 797, 833 N.Y.S.2d 528, quoting People v. Coleman, 183 A.D.2d 840, 841, 584 N.Y.S.2d 89 ; see People v. Harrison, 57 N.Y.2d 470, 476, 457 N.Y.S.2d 199,......