People v. Fordham, 73794
| Decision Date | 25 May 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 73794,73794 |
| Citation | 347 N.W.2d 702,419 Mich. 874 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lomon FORDHAM, Jr., Defendant-Appellee. 419 Mich. 874, 347 N.W.2d 702 |
| Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
ORDER
On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal is considered and, pursuant to GCR 1963, 853.2(4), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the Court of Appeals judgment and REINSTATE defendant's conviction for the reasons stated in Judge Joslyn's dissent.
We retain no jurisdiction.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
People v. Moore
... ... See People v Kurylczyk , 443 Mich. 289, 302303; 505 ... N.W.2d 528 (1993); see also People v Fordham , 132 ... Mich.App. 70, 76; 346 N.W.2d 899 (1984), reversed on other ... grounds 419 Mich. 874 (1984). Our Supreme Court has explained ... ...
-
People v. King, Docket No. 163102
...for which the prosecutor must establish that the defendant intended to permanently deprive the owner of property. People v. Fordham, 132 Mich.App. 70, 75, 346 N.W.2d 899 (1984), rev'd on other grounds 419 Mich. 874, 347 N.W.2d 702 (1984). The defense of intoxication will negate the specific......
-
People v. Traylor, Docket No. 76954
...entirety, it is clear that the jury was properly instructed on the proper uses of the evidence produced at trial. People v. Fordham, 132 Mich.App. 70, 76, 346 N.W.2d 899 (1984), rev'd on other grounds 419 Mich. 874, 347 N.W.2d 702 Affirmed. * Patrick J. Duggan, 3rd Judicial Circuit Judge, s......
- Watkins v. Attorney Grievance Com'n, 73357