People v. Francisco
Decision Date | 28 January 1970 |
Docket Number | No. 42180,42180 |
Citation | 44 Ill.2d 373,255 N.E.2d 413 |
Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Arthur FRANCISCO, Appellant. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
Geter & Geter, Chicago (Howard D. Geter, Sr., and Howard D. Geter, Jr., Chicago, of counsel), for appellant.
William J. Scott, Atty. Gen., Springfield, and Edward V. Hanrahan, State's Atty., Chicago (James B. Zagel, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Elmer C. Kissane and John R. McClory, Asst. State's Attys., of counsel), for the People.
The appellant, Arthur Francisco, having been convicted of the crime of gambling in the circuit court of Cook County, was placed on probation for two years and fined $90. Before trial he had moved to quash a search warrant which had authorized the search of his person and his auto, and to suppress certain evidence seized under the warrant. The motion claimed that the complaint upon which the search warrant was based did not set forth facts sufficient to show probable cause for issuance of the warrant. The trial court denied the motion and the appellant at trial was found guilty. His appeal to this court contends that his constitutional rights were violated by the circuit court's denial of his motion.
It is argued that the warrant was improperly issued in that the complaint upon which the warrant was based does not set forth any facts which would enable a magistrate to find probable cause to issue a warrant. The complaint for the search warrant stated:
It is the appellant's position that as the affiant police officer did not personally observe any violation of the law the only basis for the finding of probable cause was the hearsay evidence of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Batac, 2-92-0577
...basis to establish probable cause, so long as there is a substantial basis for crediting the hearsay." (People v. Francisco (1970), 44 Ill.2d 373, 375, 255 N.E.2d 413.) We believe there was sufficient connection between the alleged crime and the 523 North Craig THE DEFENDANT'S POST-ARREST S......
-
People v. Free
...doubt that the warrant should be issued. (See People v. Fiorito (1960), 19 Ill.2d 246, 257, 166 N.E.2d 606; People v. Francisco (1970), 44 Ill.2d 373, 376, 255 N.E.2d 413.) In our case, even if we exclude defendant's allegedly involuntary statement that the gun was in the basement of the ho......
-
People v. Wolski
...that evidence of the crime is in the place to be searched. People v. George (1971), 49 Ill.2d 372, 274 N.E.2d 26; People v. Francisco (1970), 44 Ill.2d 373, 255 N.E.2d 413. The complaint and affidavit in this case, signed under oath by one of the investigating police officers, alleged in re......
-
People v. Stewart
...of it is at the place to be searched. (People v. Free (1983), 94 Ill.2d 378, 400, 69 Ill.Dec. 1, 447 N.E.2d 218; People v. Francisco (1970), 44 Ill.2d 373, 376, 255 N.E.2d 413.) It is not contended that there was insufficient evidence to believe that several offenses had been committed. Ins......