People v. Gambichler
Decision Date | 24 January 2006 |
Docket Number | 2004-05441. |
Citation | 2006 NY Slip Op 00533,807 N.Y.S.2d 310,25 A.D.3d 722 |
Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEVIN GAMBICHLER, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the County Court improvidently exercised its discretion in resentencing him on the violation of probation without obtaining an updated presentence report is not preserved for appellate review because it was not raised before the County Court (see People v Freeman, 2 AD3d 648, 649 [2003]; People v Segar, 295 AD2d 628, 629 [2002]; People v Pierre-Paul, 289 AD2d 262 [2001]; People v Viruet, 288 AD2d 407 [2001]).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Anderson
...improperly sentenced him without ordering an updated presentence report is unpreserved for appellate review ( see People v. Gambichler, 25 A.D.3d 722, 723, 807 N.Y.S.2d 310), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( seeCPL 470.05[2] ). There is n......
-
People v. Mannina
...probation without ordering an updated presentence report is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05[2]; People v. Gambichler, 25 A.D.3d 722, 723, 807 N.Y.S.2d 310) and, in any event, without merit ( see People v. Kuey, 83 N.Y.2d 278, 282, 609 N.Y.S.2d 568, 631 N.E.2d 574; cf. Peop......
- People v. Gambichler
- People v. Burke