People v. Garcia

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
Citation92 N.Y.2d 869,700 N.E.2d 311,677 N.Y.S.2d 772
Parties, 700 N.E.2d 311, 1998 N.Y. Slip Op. 6992 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ismael GARCIA, Appellant.
Decision Date09 July 1998

Page 772

677 N.Y.S.2d 772
92 N.Y.2d 869, 700 N.E.2d 311, 1998
N.Y. Slip Op. 6992
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Ismael GARCIA, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of New York.
July 9, 1998.

Richard M. Greenberg, New York City, for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney of Bronx County, New York City (Kevin Scott Koplin, Karen Swiger and Joseph N. Ferdenzi, of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

On appeal, defendant contends that since he was misinformed about the maximum sentence to which he was exposed, his guilty plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Whether a plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary is dependent upon a number of factors "including the nature and terms of the agreement, the reasonableness of the bargain, and the age and experience of the accused" (People v. Hidalgo, 91 N.Y.2d 733, 736, 675 N.Y.S.2d 327, 698 N.E.2d 46). That the defendant allegedly received inaccurate information regarding his possible sentence exposure is another factor which must be considered by the court, but it is not, in and of itself, dispositive.

The record demonstrates that the length of the sentence was but one of many elements considered by the defendant before the plea was accepted. It is also true, on the facts presented here, that the defendant, arguably, could have received a consecutive sentence as his attorney advised him. Thus, it cannot be said, as a matter of law, that defendant's plea of guilty was not knowing, intelligent and voluntary. Defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

KAYE, C.J., and TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and WESLEY, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

To continue reading

Request your trial
53 cases
  • People v. Mack, 2017-00599
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 30 Enero 2019
    ...nature and terms of the agreement, the reasonableness of the bargain, and the age and experience of the accused’ " ( People v. Garcia, 92 N.Y.2d 869, 870, 677 N.Y.S.2d 772, 700 N.E.2d 311, quoting People v. Hidalgo, 91 N.Y.2d 733, 736, 675 N.Y.S.2d 327, 698 N.E.2d 46 ; see People v. Conceic......
  • People v. White, 109113
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 30 Mayo 2019
    ...of defendant's plea, and such misstatement – standing alone – would not have rendered defendant's plea involuntary (see People v. Garcia, 92 N.Y.2d 869, 870, 677 N.Y.S.2d 772, 700 N.E.2d 311 [1998] ; People v. DePerno, 148 A.D.3d 1463, 1464 [2017], lv denied 29 N.Y.3d 1030, 62 N.Y.S.3d 299,......
  • People v. Mills, 2018–00104
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 11 Marzo 2020
    ...nature and terms of the agreement, the reasonableness of the bargain, and the age and experience of the accused’ " ( People v. Garcia, 92 N.Y.2d 869, 870, 677 N.Y.S.2d 772, 700 N.E.2d 311, quoting People v. Hidalgo, 91 N.Y.2d 733, 736, 675 N.Y.S.2d 327, 698 N.E.2d 46 ).We agree with the Sup......
  • People v. Williams, 1288
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 22 Marzo 2019
    ...1259, 808 N.Y.S.2d 515 [4th Dept. 2005], lv denied 6 N.Y.3d 814, 812 N.Y.S.2d 454, 845 N.E.2d 1285 [2006], quoting People v. Garcia , 92 N.Y.2d 869, 870, 677 N.Y.S.2d 772, 700 N.E.2d 311 [1998] ). Rather, in evaluating that issue, "various factors must be considered, ‘including the nature a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT