People v. Garrett

Docket Number133
Decision Date30 June 2014

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
127 cases
  • People v. Garrett
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 30, 2014
  • People v. Pennant
    • United States
    • New York District Court
    • October 15, 2021
    ...1, 135 N.E.3d 1081 (2019) ; People v. Ulett , 33 N.Y.3d 512, 105 N.Y.S.3d 371, 129 N.E.3d 909 (2019) ; People v. Garrett , 23 N.Y.3d 878, 994 N.Y.S.2d 22, 18 N.E.3d 722 (2014) and People v. Hunter , 11 N.Y.3d 1, 862 N.Y.S.2d 301, 892 N.E.2d 365 (2008)The court in United States v. Agurs , su......
  • People v. Werkheiser
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 11, 2019
    ...and prosecution, and that she was not in possession of the video prior to defendant's trial (see People v. Garrett , 23 N.Y.3d 878, 889, 994 N.Y.S.2d 22, 18 N.E.3d 722 [2014] ; see generally People v. Mangarillo , 152 A.D.3d at 1064, 59 N.Y.S.3d 572 ). The video also cannot be considered su......
  • People v. Campbell
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 8, 2021
    ...find that there was a reasonable possibility that it would have changed the outcome of the proceeding (see People v. Garrett, 23 N.Y.3d 878, 885, 994 N.Y.S.2d 22, 18 N.E.3d 722 [2014] ; People v. Wideman, 192 A.D.3d 1384, 1387, 145 N.Y.S.3d 194 [2021] ; People v. Heimroth, 181 A.D.3d 967, 9......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Cop- Like ("[like]"): The First Amendment, Criminal Procedure, and the Regulation of Police Social Media Speech.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law Review Vol. 74 No. 6, June 2022
    • June 1, 2022
    ...(303.) State Attorney Issues "Death Letter" over Bartow Cop's "Gorilla" Comment, supra note 189. (304.) See, e.g., People v. Garrett, 18 N.E.3d 722, 731 (N.Y. 2014) ("O'Leary's knowledge of his own alleged misconduct and the civil action against him could not be imputed to the People for Br......
  • 20-b-2 What You Can Complain About in an Article 440 Motion
    • United States
    • A Jailhouse Lawyer's Manual (2020 Edition) Chapter 20 Using Article 440 of the New York Criminal Procedure Law to Attack Your Unfair Conviction or Illegal Sentence[*] (20 to 20 G) 20-b When to Use Article 440 (20-b-1 to 20-b-3)
    • Invalid date
    ...would have been different if the evidence had been disclosed.") (internal citations and quotation marks omitted), People v. Garrett, 23 N.Y. 3d 878, 891-92, 18 N.E.3d 722, 755-56 (2014) (explaining that for the materiality prong of Brady test, there must be "a 'reasonable possibility' that ......