People v. Glenn
Decision Date | 11 October 1977 |
Citation | 59 A.D.2d 724,398 N.Y.S.2d 364 |
Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. James GLENN, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Michael E. Lipson, New York City, for appellant.
Eugene Gold, Dist. Atty., Brooklyn (Helman R. Brook, Brooklyn, of counsel, Peter Samberg, on the brief), for respondent.
Before HOPKINS, J. P., and LATHAM, MARGETT and SUOZZI, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 22, 1976, convicting him of attempted forgery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Judgment reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, plea of guilty vacated, and indictment reinstated.
The counts of forgery in the second degree and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, two of the counts alleged in the indictment, involved a bogus operator's license.If in fact, as alleged in defendant's brief, he had a valid interim driver's license which he ignorantly thought was a mere "permit" and of no help to him in the circumstance of needing to show a driver's license, adequate representation by counsel would have corrected this misinformation.
Despite the apparently perfect defense to the aforementioned counts of a valid driver's license, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted forgery in the second degree.We view the failure of counsel to advise the defendant and the court of the existing defense as such incompetent and inadequate representation as to have...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Barker v. Jones
...to overturn convictions entered on guilty pleas in circumstances like those alleged to be present here, e. g., People v. Glenn, 59 A.D.2d 724, 398 N.Y.S.2d 364 (2d Dep't 1977). See also People v. Droz, 39 N.Y.2d 457, 384 N.Y.S.2d 404, 348 N.E.2d 880 Furthermore, it is plain that petitioner'......
-
People v. Barker
...had been denied effective assistance of counsel (see People v. Bennett, 29 N.Y.2d 462, 329 N.Y.S.2d 801, 280 N.E.2d 637; People v. Glenn, 59 A.D.2d 724, 398 N.Y.S.2d 364). We would have been inclined to order a hearing for the purpose of making factual determinations relative to this issue ......