People v. Goodman

Decision Date12 January 1967
Citation276 N.Y.S.2d 946,27 A.D.2d 692
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joe GOODMAN, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

John J. Darcy, Rochester, for appellant.

John C. Little, Jr., Rochester, for respondent(Eugene Bergin, Rochester, of counsel).

Before WILLIAMS, P.J., and GOLDMAN, HENRY, DEL VECCHIO and MARSH, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

This appeal was remitted to County Court for a Huntley hearing to determine the voluntariness of defendant's statement (25 A.D.2d 480).Upon the hearing County Court determined that the statement was voluntarily made.An integral part of that hearing was defendant's claim that he had requested counsel before making the statement.The People's witness categorically denied that such a request had been made, as claimed by defendant.County Court failed to make a finding as to whether the People had proved beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant did not request counsel before he made his statement.(See, People v. Neureuter, 26 A.D.2d 899, 274 N.Y.S.2d 564;People v. Spears, 26 A.D.2d 893, 274 N.Y.S.2d 666, andPeople v. Michalski, 26 A.D.2d 766, 272 N.Y.S.2d 1021.)The matter is remitted to Monroe County Court, Rosenthal, J. for a finding on this specific question of request for counsel, and the appeal is held pending the submission of this finding to this court.

Appeal held, decision reserved, and matter remitted to Monroe County Court, (Rosenthal, J.) for further proceedings in...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • People v. Robinson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 29 June 1967
    ...requested the aid of an attorney. (See Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908, 1 A.L.R.3d 1205; People v. Goodman, 27 A.D.2d 692, 276 N.Y.S.2d 946; People v. Neureuter, 26 A.D.2d 899, 274 N.Y.S.2d 564; People v. Spears, 26 A.D.2d 893, 274 N.Y.S.2d 666; People v. Micha......
  • People v. Goodman
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 15 June 1967
    ...following the hearing as to voluntariness of the statement made by the defendant as ordered by this Court (25 A.D.2d 480; 27 A.D.2d 692, 276 N.Y.S.2d 946), unanimously affirmed. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Rosenthal, J., convicting defendant of Assault, 2nd degree. Second ......