People v. Goodman

Citation446 N.Y.S.2d 202,54 N.Y.2d 451,430 N.E.2d 1255
Parties, 430 N.E.2d 1255 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Morgan GOODMAN, Appellant.
Decision Date17 December 1981
CourtNew York Court of Appeals

Raymond C. Volper and Stephen J. Pittari, White Plains, for appellant.

Carl A. Vergari, Dist. Atty. (Richard E. Weill, Gerald D. Reilly and Anthony J. Servino, Asst. Dist. Attys., of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

JONES, Judge.

We cannot agree with the Appellate Division, 80 A.D.2d 837, 436 N.Y.S.2d 335, that, in the circumstances of this case, the admission into evidence of statements taken from defendant in violation of his constitutional rights was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

Late in the afternoon of January 24, 1978, the body of Elodie Henschel was found in her New Rochelle apartment by the assistant manager of the building. Investigation disclosed that she had been brutally killed and that two diamond rings which she wore were gone.

In the course of the police investigation, on January 25, 1978 three officers went to the second floor apartment over the ground floor apartment of the deceased and in which her body had been found. On arrival the police found defendant present. The apartment was occupied by the Flaherty family, and Lynn Flaherty was his girlfriend. The police were aware of defendant inasmuch as he had previously voluntarily furnished them with some general information as to having seen a "group of suspicious people" near the scene of the homicide. Although he was not then a suspect, the police brought defendant to police headquarters for questioning. On arrival, without being given his constitutional preinterrogation warnings, defendant was questioned concerning his whereabouts on January 23 and 24, 1978. He answered that he was a student at the Educage School in White Plains and that on his way to school on January 23, at about 8:55 a. m., he had stopped off at the White Plains Mall and there had tripped over a curb, injuring his knee. He had left the school at noon and had gone with his friend Robert Shafran back to the White Plains Mall and then on to Nicky's luncheonette on Mamaroneck Avenue, White Plains, where they had remained until 1:00 p. m. Then someone named "Bob" had driven him home where he had stayed until Lynn Flaherty had picked him up at 2:30 and driven him to her home in New Rochelle.

On January 24, 1978, according to defendant, his mother had driven him to school but he had not gone in. Instead, he had taken a taxicab to the White Plains Hospital because of his injured knee. After finishing at the hospital, he had gone to the White Plains railroad station, had met Shafran there, and the two had ridden to New York City to buy marihuana for $525. Defendant added that he had known Mrs. Henschel for two and one-half years, as long as he had known Lynn, and had been inside her apartment three times.

Defendant was not arrested on the present charges until a year later on January 26, 1979. A felony complaint was filed on January 27, 1979 and defendant was indicted on January 30, 1979. 1

Defendant's motion to suppress the statements that he made to the police on January 25, 1978 was denied by the suppression court which found that defendant had agreed to accompany the officers to police headquarters, that he was not in custody, and that the statements he made were voluntary.

At the trial there was extensive testimony that on January 20, 1978 defendant and a fellow student, Robert Shafran, had discussed the theft of two diamond rings from Elodie Henschel; that defendant told Shafran that he would kill her if he had to; that on January 23, 1978 Shafran made arrangements with Robert Carpenter, another student who had access to his parents' automobile, to drive defendant and Shafran to the Henschel apartment; that when Carpenter drove them to the apartment they were also accompanied by another friend, Robert Benedict, who had come along for the ride; that at their destination defendant left, saying that he would be back in about 20 minutes; that when defendant returned his manner was jittery, he seemed upset and looked pale and that there was a bloodlike substance on his hands and clothing; that beneath his coat he was carrying something that looked like a tire iron; that he showed Shafran two diamond rings which appeared to have blood on them; that the four then drove to defendant's house where defendant and Shafran went in; that once in the house defendant stated, "I killed her", started to wash the blood from his hands and clothing as well as from the iron that he had had beneath his coat, and told Shafran that he had injured his leg; that defendant later burned his clothes; that defendant and Shafran agreed on an identical alibi; that on the following day Carpenter, after first refusing, drove defendant and Shafran to the White Plains railroad station for a payment of $50; that on the way Carpenter saw the rings; that defendant and Shafran caught a train to New York where they went to the jewelry district and sold the rings to a fence for $2,000 before returning to Westchester County.

The detailed inculpatory testimony just recited came from Shafran, 2 Carpenter and Benedict. The trial court charged that Shafran was an accomplice as a matter of law and left it to the jury under proper instructions to determine whether, as questions of fact, Carpenter and Benedict were accomplices. The jury was also instructed with respect to testimony of accomplices as to the necessity for independent corroborative evidence tending to connect defendant with the commission of the offenses charged.

The jury acquitted defendant of charges of common-law murder, felony murder, robbery, burglary and possession of a weapon, but convicted him of grand larceny in the second degree.

On appeal the Appellate Division affirmed defendant's...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • People v. Goodman
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • December 18, 1986
    ...of defendant's statement to the police, and remanded the matter for a new trial on the larceny charge (People v. Goodman, 54 N.Y.2d 451, 446 N.Y.S.2d 202, 430 N.E.2d 1255). On retrial, defendant was again convicted. On this appeal he contends the judgment must be reversed because the People......
  • Fox v. Martuscello
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • September 30, 2019
    ..."testified in conclusory fashion" about the key facts regarding the voluntariness of the defendant's statements. People v. Goodman, 430 N.E.2d 1255, 1257 (N.Y. 1981). But these are far from the circumstances present here. Rather, here, the State called three detectives to the stand—Detectiv......
  • People v. Ringer
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • May 23, 1988
    ...( People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 367 N.Y.S.2d 213, 326 N.E.2d 787) and thus a new trial is ordered ( see, People v. Goodman, 54 N.Y.2d 451, 446 N.Y.S.2d 202, 430 N.E.2d 1255; People v. Felder, 47 N.Y.2d 287, 418 N.Y.S.2d 295, 391 N.E.2d ...
  • People v. Washington
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • May 25, 1983
    ...reasonable possibility that its admission into evidence might have contributed to defendant's conviction (see People v. Goodman, 54 N.Y.2d 451, 446 N.Y.S.2d 202, 430 N.E.2d 1255). We have examined the other issues raised by defendant and find them to be without Judgment unanimously affirmed. ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT