People v. Hagzan
| Decision Date | 20 November 1989 |
| Citation | People v. Hagzan, 547 N.Y.S.2d 670, 155 A.D.2d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989) |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. George HAGZAN, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Steven J. Wilutis, Commack, for appellant.
Patrick Henry, Dist. Atty., Riverhead (Donald J. Byrnes, of counsel), for respondent.
MANGANO, J.P., and KUNZEMAN, RUBIN, EIBER and BALLETTA, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County(Sherman, J.), all rendered July 30, 1987, convicting him of forgery in the second degree under IndictmentNumber 1438/86, robbery in the first degree (five counts), and attempted robbery in the first degree under IndictmentNumber 1489/86, and robbery in the first degree under IndictmentNumber 1545/86, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.
ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.
It is well settled that the decision as to whether to permit a defendant to withdraw a previously entered plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the court(see, People v. Gomez, 142 AD2d 649, 531 N.Y.S.2d 14).In the instant case, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily made a complete plea allocution in the presence of competent counsel, after the court had fully apprised the defendant of the consequences of his pleas (see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 909, 474 N.Y.S.2d 1031, 462 N.E.2d 1209).Moreover, at no time did the defendant claim that he was innocent or assert that he had been coerced into pleading guilty.The sole basis for his application to withdraw his pleas was that he was unhappy with his bargained-for sentences.Under these circumstances, it was not an improvident exercise of discretion to deny the motion (see, People v. Morris, 118 A.D.2d 595, 499 N.Y.S.2d 13;People v. De Simone, 112 A.D.2d 443, 492 N.Y.S.2d 414;People v. Bass, 92 A.D.2d 1062, 461...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
People v. Andrade
...in the presence of competent counsel and after the court had fully apprised her of the consequences of her plea (see, People v. Hagzan, 155 A.D.2d 616, 547 N.Y.S.2d 670; People v. Wood, 150 A.D.2d 411, 540 N.Y.S.2d 842). Similarly, we conclude that the court properly denied the defendant's ......
-
People v. Flakes
...Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant has no basis now to complain that his sentence was excessive (see, People v. Hagzan, 155 A.D.2d 616, 547 N.Y.S.2d 670; People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816, 475 N.Y.S.2d ...
-
People v. Cooper
...sentence. Under these circumstances, it was not an improvident exercise of discretion to deny the motion (see, People v. Hagzan, 155 A.D.2d 616, 617, 547 N.Y.S.2d 670; People v. Morris, 118 A.D.2d 595, 499 N.Y.S.2d 13; see also, People v. DeSimone, 112 A.D.2d 443, 492 N.Y.S.2d 414; People v......
-
People v. Cantu
...sound discretion of the court (see, People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520, 524-525, 410 N.Y.S.2d 555, 382 N.E.2d 1332; People v. Hagzan, 155 A.D.2d 616, 617, 547 N.Y.S.2d 670). Among the grounds supporting the exercise of that discretion are claims of innocence, fraud or mistake (People v. Can......