People v. Hall

Decision Date14 July 2011
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,v.Alexander HALL, Defendant–Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

86 A.D.3d 450
926 N.Y.S.2d 514
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 05936

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Alexander HALL, Defendant–Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

July 14, 2011.


[926 N.Y.S.2d 515]

Mischel & Horn, P.C., New York (Richard E. Mischel of counsel), for appellant.Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Susan Axelrod of counsel), for respondent.GONZALEZ, P.J., TOM, ANDRIAS, MOSKOWITZ, FREEDMAN, JJ.

[86 A.D.3d 450] Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, J. at suppression motion; Ruth Pickholz, J. at jury trial and sentence), rendered November 8, 2007, convicting defendant of manslaughter in the second degree, assault in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 5 to 15 years on the manslaughter count, 1 year on the assault counts and 15 years on the weapon count, unanimously affirmed.

At about 3:30 a.m. on the morning of October 12, 2005, defendant and three of his friends, after spending the night drinking at a club, were involved in an altercation with a club promoter, which ended with the arrival of police. As they walked to their cars, one of defendant's friends was hit on the head with a broken bottle, sustaining a cut. Records of cell tower transmissions disclosed that defendant and one companion first drove south toward his apartment but, at 4:02 a.m., headed back north toward the club. At 4:08 a.m., calls placed from both men's phones were relayed from a cell tower located to the north of the club. Defendant's call was received by one of his friends riding in the other car, who related that defendant had stated that he was on his way back to the club.

At about 4:10 a.m., defendant opened fire on a group of club patrons who had just left the club and remained in front of the establishment after its 4:00 a.m. closing time. One bullet struck Tabitha Perez, the mother of a seven-year-old boy, piercing her lung and causing her death. Another round struck Ruben Batista, a homeless man, in the leg, shattering a bone. A third victim, Jeremy Soto, was injured by a bullet that passed through his calf and another that grazed his finger. The parties stipulated that a call was made to 911 at 4:11 a.m., and cell phone records revealed

[926 N.Y.S.2d 516]

that a call made from defendant's phone at 4:13 [86 A.D.3d 451] a.m. was handled by a cell tower at 179th Street, just north of the club, located between 176th and 177th Streets. Defendant was identified as the shooter at a lineup by a witness who had described him as young, with dark hair and a light complexion, dark eyes and distinctive, arched eyebrows.

Some nine months later, as the result of an unrelated narcotics investigation, police arrested defendant's traveling...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • People v. Campos
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 9 Noviembre 2015
  • People v. Taylor
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 2 Febrero 2018
    ...93 A.D.3d 450, 451, 939 N.Y.S.2d 452 [1st Dept. 2012], lv denied 19 N.Y.3d 977, 950 N.Y.S.2d 360, 973 N.E.2d 770 [2012] ; People v. Hall, 86 A.D.3d 450, 451–452, 926 N.Y.S.2d 514 [1st Dept. 2011], lv denied 19 N.Y.3d 961, 950 N.Y.S.2d 113, 973 N.E.2d 211 [2012], cert denied 568 U.S. 1163, 1......
  • People v. Jiles
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 22 Diciembre 2017
    ...448 N.Y.S.2d 448, 433 N.E.2d 513 ; see People v. Guerra, 65 N.Y.2d 60, 63–64, 489 N.Y.S.2d 718, 478 N.E.2d 1319 [1985] ; People v. Hall, 86 A.D.3d 450, 451–452, 926 N.Y.S.2d 514 [1st Dept. 2011], lv denied 19 N.Y.3d 961, 950 N.Y.S.2d 113, 973 N.E.2d 211 [2012], cert. denied 568 U.S. 1163, 1......
  • People v. Garcia
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 24 Marzo 2017
    ...review his challenge in his pro se supplemental brief to the use of information from certain cellular phone records (see People v. Hall, 86 A.D.3d 450, 451–452, 926 N.Y.S.2d 514, lv. denied 19 N.Y.3d 961, 950 N.Y.S.2d 113, 973 N.E.2d 211, cert. denied ––– U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 1240, 185 L.Ed......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT