People v. Handlin

Decision Date04 December 1989
Citation156 A.D.2d 380,548 N.Y.S.2d 334
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Walter HANDLIN, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Steven R. Bernhard, Mineola, for appellant.

Patrick Henry, Dist. Atty., Riverhead (Paul M. Hensley, of counsel; Daniel P. McCormick, on the brief), for respondent.

Before MOLLEN, P.J., and LAWRENCE, KOOPER and HARWOOD, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McInerney, J.), rendered July 29, 1987, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim that his plea of guilty was coerced is unpreserved for appellate review and in any event is refuted by the record (see, People v. Mattocks, 100 A.D.2d 944, 474 N.Y.S.2d 849; see also, People v. Corwise, 120 A.D.2d 604, 502 N.Y.S.2d 223). To the extent that the defendant separately claims that his right to a speedy trial was violated, and to the extent that such a claim might otherwise survive his guilty plea (see, People v. Friscia, 51 N.Y.2d 845, 433 N.Y.S.2d 754, 413 N.E.2d 1168; People v. Walker, 109 A.D.2d 858, 486 N.Y.S.2d 377; see also, People v. Blakley, 34 N.Y.2d 311, 357 N.Y.S.2d 459, 313 N.E.2d 763; People v. Thomas, 74 A.D.2d 317, 428 N.Y.S.2d 20, affd. 53 N.Y.2d 338, 441 N.Y.S.2d 650, 424 N.E.2d 537), we note that the defendant made no motion to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds. The issue is therefore unpreserved for appellate review ( see, People v. Thomas, supra, at 321). Finally, the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed and we discern no basis for disturbing that sentence...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • People v. Harper
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 4, 1989
  • People v. Lopez
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 4, 1991
    ...in connection with the plea agreement, the defendant may not now be heard to complain (see, People v. Gonzalez, supra; People v. Handlin, 156 A.D.2d 380, 548 N.Y.S.2d 334; People v. Winston, 114 A.D.2d 918, 494 N.Y.S.2d 1012; People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816, 817, 475 N.Y.S.2d ...
  • People v. Handlin
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • January 31, 1990
    ...552 N.Y.S.2d 563 75 N.Y.2d 813, 551 N.E.2d 1241 People v. Handlin (Walter) COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK JAN 31, 1990 Hancock, J. 156 A.D.2d 380, 548 N.Y.S.2d 334 App.Div. 2, Suffolk Denied ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT