People v. Harris
| Decision Date | 11 December 1995 |
| Citation | 222 A.D.2d 522,635 N.Y.S.2d 258 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Russell HARRIS, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Gary Greenwald, Goshen, for appellant.
Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen (Richard B. Schoenberg, of counsel), for respondent.
Before MILLER, J.P., and O'BRIEN, PIZZUTO and KRAUSMAN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered August 10, 1994, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, CPL 220.60[3]; People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520, 410 N.Y.S.2d 555, 382 N.E.2d 1332; People v. Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926, 365 N.Y.S.2d 161, 324 N.E.2d 544; People v. Ortiz, 216 A.D.2d 495, 628 N.Y.S.2d 559; People v. Lisbon, 187 A.D.2d 457, 589 N.Y.S.2d 527). The defendant knowingly and voluntarily admitted his guilt in a thorough and complete allocution. He indicated that he was entering the plea voluntarily, stated twice that no one had forced or coerced him to enter the plea of guilty, and averred that he was pleading guilty because he was in fact the perpetrator of the crime. Moreover, the testimony adduced at the evidentiary hearing in connection with the motion to withdraw the plea of guilty adequately demonstrated that the defendant's plea was the product of his free choice.
The defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is refuted by the record of the plea proceeding in which the defendant admitted that he had a full and complete opportunity to speak to his attorneys, that he was satisfied with his attorneys' legal advice, and that he was satisfied with his legal representation in this case (see, People v. Richardson 14 A.D.2d 624, 624 N.Y.S.2d 960; People v. Zaia, 181 A.D.2d 931, 582 N.Y.S.2d 212). Additionally, the record of the evidentiary hearing demonstrates that the defendant received effective assistance of counsel (see, People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 444 N.Y.S.2d 893, 429 N.E.2d 400).
The defendant's contention that his absence from a pretrial conference to discuss a possible plea agreement deprived him of the right to be present at a material stage of the trial is without merit. A defendant has the right to be present during a proceeding involving factual matters about which he might have peculiar...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Melendez
...78 L.Ed. 674; People v. Martinez, 224 A.D.2d 326, 638 N.Y.S.2d 46; People v. Richard, 222 A.D.2d 708, 636 N.Y.S.2d 352; People v. Harris, 222 A.D.2d 522, 635 N.Y.S.2d 258; People v. Jayson, 215 A.D.2d 794, 626 N.Y.S.2d 318; People v. Stanley, 212 A.D.2d 983, 624 N.Y.S.2d 313; People v. Colo......
-
People v. Soria
...was satisfied with his attorney's advice and legal services ( see People v. Maye, 64 A.D.3d 617, 881 N.Y.S.2d 322;People v. Harris, 222 A.D.2d 522, 523, 635 N.Y.S.2d 258;People v. Richardson, 214 A.D.2d 624, 625, 624 N.Y.S.2d ...
-
People v. Vega
...that no one, including the defense counsel, had coerced the plea, and that he was pleading guilty voluntarily (see, People v. Harris, 222 A.D.2d 522, 635 N.Y.S.2d 258; People v. Richardson, 214 A.D.2d 624, 624 N.Y.S.2d 960; People v. Hall, 195 A.D.2d 521, 600 N.Y.S.2d 274). Further, "[t]he ......
-
Hower v. State
...any constitutional right to be present during plea negotiations between the prosecutor and defense counsel.”); People v. Harris, 222 A.D.2d 522, 523, 635 N.Y.S.2d 258 (1995) (defendant's absence from a pretrial conference to discuss a possible plea agreement did not violate his right to be ......