People v. Harris

Decision Date07 October 1970
Docket NumberNo. 41920,41920
Citation263 N.E.2d 35,46 Ill.2d 395
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Robert HARRIS, Appellant.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

Dale L. Schlafer, Chicago, appointed by the court, for appellant.

William J. Scott, Atty. Gen., Springfield, and Edward V. Hanrahan, State's Atty., Chicago (James B. Zagel, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Robert A. Novelle and Arthur L. Belkind, Asst. State's Attys., of counsel), for the People.

BURT, Justice.

The appellant, Robert Harris, was indicted by a Cook County grand jury for the offense of armed robbery, allegedly committed on February 22, 1968. The indictment stated that the defendant 'by the use of force, and while armed with a dangerous weapon, took one hundred fifty dollars in United States currency from the person and presence of John Doyle, in violation of Chapter 38, Section 18--2 of the Illinois Revised Statutes 1967 * * *.'

Three persons were indicted. This appeal involves only one of them, herein referred to as appellant. Only the appellant demanded a jury trial, but all three defendants were tried together (two by the judge and the appellant by the jury). All three were represented by the same public defender. The appellant was found guilty by the jury and was sentenced to a term of not less than six nor more than ten years. One of the other defendants was found not guilty and a third defendant was found guilty.

This is an appeal to this court, since constitutional questions are raised. The only witness to identify appellant Harris was John R. Doyle, a drug store clerk. The issues presented are as follows:

(1) Whether the in-court identification of appellant was admissible.

(2) Whether there was a fatal variance between the indictment and the proof.

(3) Whether the trial court properly refused to allow the appellant to exhibit to the jury his lack of teeth on one side of his mouth without waiving his privilege against self-incrimination.

(4) Whether the trial court committed error in admitting proof of other crimes to the jury.

John Doyle testified that he was employed at Van's Drug Store, and that at about 10:20 A.M. appellant Robert Harris came into the store and was looking around. A few minutes later one of the other defendants (Freddie Mae Davis) came in and asked for some iron pills. As Doyle turned to go to the back of the store to get them, appellant Robert Harris cut in front of him, holding a revolver. Doyle looked toward Freddie Mae Davis and saw that she was also holding a revolver. However, a second girl, who was at the front of the store, apparently did not have a gun. Doyle stated that he noticed nothing unusual about appellant Harris, and that he did not look at his teeth, although he observed that he had a mustache. The woman with one of the guns gestured toward the cash register and told Doyle to open it, which he did. She reached in and took the currency out.

Then appellant Harris, who was still behind the counter, said to Doyle, 'Come here' and ordered Doyle to go in the back and open the safe, which Doyle did. Doyle opened the outer and inner doors of the safe and stepped back and appellant opened the drawers and took the money out of the safe and then asked Doyle for the cocaine. Doyle told him there was no cocaine, and appellant rooted through the drawer and picked up one bottle containing a narcotic drug. Appellant then told Doyle to sit on the floor together with the other clerk in the store as well as an older lady customer who had come into the store. Appellant Harris took $135 in bills and a quantity of rolled coins from the safe. Doyle in court described the man as Negro, 5 10 or 5 11 , weighing 165 or 170 pounds. Appellant was in the store for 15 minutes. Doyle got a good look at the appellant when he was standing at the counter but did not look at his teeth. He was only four feet from Doyle, and Doyle observed appellant for about one minute. Appellant was not wearing anything to conceal his identity and the lighting conditions were good, being supplied by fluorescent lights in the store.

Two police officers were patrolling in the area in a marked police car when they were passed by a car traveling at about 30 to 40 miles per hour in a 15 mile-per-hour zone. They chased the car which matched a description that had earlier been given them, and it finally went off the road and ran into a tree. One officer saw appellant Harris take a gun from his coat pocket and put in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • People v. Fleming
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • November 17, 1980
    ...three identifications was based on an independent origin. People v. Patrick (1972), 53 Ill.2d 201, 290 N.E.2d 227; People v. Harris (1970), 46 Ill.2d 395, 263 N.E.2d 35; People v. Huffman (1980), 81 Ill.App.3d 901, 37 Ill.Dec. 118, 401 N.E.2d 1211; People v. Henderson (1976), 36 Ill.App.3d ......
  • People v. Hornal
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • June 9, 1975
    ...such evidence is admissible provided it is limited to evidence which has a tendency to disprove the defendant's alibi (People v. Harris, 46 Ill.2d 395, 263 N.E.2d 35), which has a tendency to prove the absence of mistake (People v. Dewey, 42 Ill.2d 148, 246 N.E.2d 232), or which establishes......
  • State v. Norris
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • February 13, 1979
    ...Counsel for the parties profess their inability to find a case in point. Our research has unearthed five cases. In People v. Harris, 46 Ill.2d 395, 263 N.E.2d 35, 37 (1970), the defendant wanted to display his peculiar teeth to the jury to establish he was not the guilty party. The request ......
  • People v. Montgomery
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • June 2, 1981
    ...of the complaint they had omitted to put before the court any facts bearing upon their guilt or innocence. In People v. Harris (1970), 46 Ill.2d 395, 263 N.E.2d 35, defendant was accused of armed robbery, defined by sections 18-1 and 18-2 of [96 Ill.App.3d 998] the Criminal Code of 1961 (Il......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT