People v. Harris, 76640
| Decision Date | 04 December 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 76640,76640 |
| Citation | 424 Mich. 851,377 N.W.2d 307 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Otto HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. 424 Mich. 851, 377 N.W.2d 307 |
| Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
The Court of Appeals decision dated May 28, 1985, the Court of Appeals briefs and record, and the trial court record have been considered by the Court, pursuant to a letter request of the defendant under MCR 7.303, to determine whether leave to appeal or other relief should be granted by the Court.
On order of the Court, the letter request is treated as an application for leave to appeal and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment granting the defendant the right only to file an application for leave to appeal of issues arising in the transcript not provided to defendant. We REMAND the case to the Court of Appeals which shall, while retaining jurisdiction, grant the defendant the right to file a brief supplementing his appeal as of right with any issues raised by the voir dire examination. In all other respects, the application is DENIED.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Boyd v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
...relevant questions subsequent to a loss, Gibson v. Group Ins. Co. of Michigan, 142 Mich.App. 271, 369 N.W.2d 484 (1985), lv. den. 424 Mich. 851 (1985). The latter decisions required construction of loss-payable clauses when the policy provided coverage, but for the failure of the loss payee......
- Celina Mut. Ins. Co. v. Aetna Life & Cas. Co.