People v. Haynes, S080149.

Decision Date28 February 2001
Docket NumberNo. S080149.,S080149.
Citation18 P.3d 660,104 Cal.Rptr.2d 738
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
PartiesPEOPLE, Respondent, v. Daryl B. HAYNES, Appellant.

Pursuant to rule 29.4(c), California Rules of Court, the above-entitled review is DISMISSED and cause is remanded to the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Four.

Appellant's Motion to Expand Briefing is denied as moot.

GEORGE, C.J., MOSK, J., KENNARD, J., BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., and BROWN, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Ghent v. Woodford
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • February 8, 2002
    ...Attempted rape required a specific intent to rape, but not willfulness, deliberation, or premeditation. People v. Atkins, 25 Cal.4th 76, 104 Cal.Rptr.2d 738, 18 P.3d 660, 668 (2001). Ghent presented a defense of diminished capacity.4 He argued that he failed to premeditate or deliberate wit......
  • DEGRASSI v. Cook
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • February 28, 2001

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT