People v. Hearndon, 53367

Decision Date19 July 1971
Docket NumberNo. 53367,53367
Citation188 N.W.2d 551,385 Mich. 771
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert HEARNDON, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtMichigan Supreme Court

Before the Entire Bench.

ORDER

On order of the Court, the motion by defendant and appellant to dismiss the appeal without prejudice is considered and the same is hereby granted. The application for leave to appeal is hereby denied as moot.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Hall v. Hall, Docket No. 65798
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • December 15, 1983
    ...was beyond the subpoena power of the court. See People v. Nieto, 33 Mich.App. 535, 538 fn. 7, 190 N.W.2d 579 (1971), lv. den. 385 Mich. 771 (1971). Because the plaintiff could effectively present his own testimony only in person or by deposition, once the court refused to issue the ad testi......
  • Bay County Concealed Weapons Licensing Bd. v. Gasta, Docket No. 78-4906
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • April 22, 1980
    ...arms 1 is subject to a reasonable exercise of the police power. People v. McFadden, 31 Mich.App. 512, 188 N.W.2d 141 (1971), lv. den. 385 Mich. 771 (1971). An applicant for a permit to carry a concealed weapon must meet certain age and residency requirements; the application must be approve......
  • People v. Starr
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • April 2, 1979
    ...(1968); People v. McIntosh, 389 Mich. 82, 204 N.W.2d 135 (1973); People v. Nieto, 33 Mich.App. 535, 190 N.W.2d 579 (1971), Lv. den. 385 Mich. 771 (1971). The determination of due diligence is a matter for the trial court, and that determination will not be overturned on appeal unless a clea......
  • Fabbrini Family Foods, Inc. v. United Canning Corp.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • April 18, 1979
    ...rests in the sound discretion of the trial court. Vormelker v. Oleksinski, 32 Mich.App. 498, 501, 189 N.W.2d 135 (1971), Lv. den. 385 Mich. 771 (1971). However, the power of severance should be exercised sparingly. Osgerby v. Tuscola Circuit Judge, 373 Mich. 237, 241, 128 N.W.2d 351 (1964).......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT