People v. Hearndon, 53367
Decision Date | 19 July 1971 |
Docket Number | No. 53367,53367 |
Citation | 188 N.W.2d 551,385 Mich. 771 |
Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert HEARNDON, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Before the Entire Bench.
ORDER
On order of the Court, the motion by defendant and appellant to dismiss the appeal without prejudice is considered and the same is hereby granted. The application for leave to appeal is hereby denied as moot.
To continue reading
Request your trial4 cases
-
Hall v. Hall, Docket No. 65798
...was beyond the subpoena power of the court. See People v. Nieto, 33 Mich.App. 535, 538 fn. 7, 190 N.W.2d 579 (1971), lv. den. 385 Mich. 771 (1971). Because the plaintiff could effectively present his own testimony only in person or by deposition, once the court refused to issue the ad testi......
-
Bay County Concealed Weapons Licensing Bd. v. Gasta, Docket No. 78-4906
...arms 1 is subject to a reasonable exercise of the police power. People v. McFadden, 31 Mich.App. 512, 188 N.W.2d 141 (1971), lv. den. 385 Mich. 771 (1971). An applicant for a permit to carry a concealed weapon must meet certain age and residency requirements; the application must be approve......
-
People v. Starr
...(1968); People v. McIntosh, 389 Mich. 82, 204 N.W.2d 135 (1973); People v. Nieto, 33 Mich.App. 535, 190 N.W.2d 579 (1971), Lv. den. 385 Mich. 771 (1971). The determination of due diligence is a matter for the trial court, and that determination will not be overturned on appeal unless a clea......
-
Fabbrini Family Foods, Inc. v. United Canning Corp.
...rests in the sound discretion of the trial court. Vormelker v. Oleksinski, 32 Mich.App. 498, 501, 189 N.W.2d 135 (1971), Lv. den. 385 Mich. 771 (1971). However, the power of severance should be exercised sparingly. Osgerby v. Tuscola Circuit Judge, 373 Mich. 237, 241, 128 N.W.2d 351 (1964).......