People v. Henry, Docket No. 10835
Decision Date | 23 November 1971 |
Docket Number | No. 1,Docket No. 10835,1 |
Citation | 194 N.W.2d 456,37 Mich.App. 160 |
Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Turner HENRY, Defendant-Appellant |
Court | Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US |
Carl Ziemba, Detroit, for defendant-appellant.
Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Derengoski, Sol. Gen., William L. Cahalan, Pros. Atty., Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Div., Thomas P. Smith, Asst. Pros. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before V. J. BRENNAN, P.J., and J. H. GILLIS and O'HARA, * JJ.
This is an appeal from a jury conviction of the offense of unarmed robbery, M.C.L.A. § 750.530 (Stat.Ann.1954, Rev. § 28.798). The appeal was taken of right.
As his sole assignment of error, defendant takes exception to the charge that:
(Emphasis supplied.)
In particular, defendant claims that the negative phrasing of the charge would necessarily prejudice the jury against him. This, he argues, is proscribed by Griffin v. California (1965), 380 U.S. 609, 85 S.Ct. 1229, 14 L.Ed.2d 106.
The learned trial judge's use of the word 'failure' to take the stand may be unfortunate but when read in conjunction with the balance of the charge cannot be characterized as implicitly adverse.
Even though this instruction was judicially approved in People v. Provost (1906), 144 Mich. 17, 18, 107 N.W. 716, and has found its way into the widely used and highly respected Gillespie, 1 we think that a word denoting free choice, such as, but not limited to 'election' or 'choice' might better be substituted for 'failure' in future instructions.
There was no reversible error.
Affirmed.
* MICHAEL D. O'HARA, former Supreme Court Justice, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment pursuant to Const.1963, art. 6, § 23 as amended in 1968.
1 2...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. LaTeur
...preferred words of 'election' and 'choice' instead of 'failure' to take the stand were utilized by the trial court. See People v. Henry, 37 Mich.App. 160, 194 N.W.2d 456. 5. The record on appeal does not disclose whether or not the trial judge gave, as GCR 1963, 516 requires, the defendants......