People v. Hickman
Decision Date | 25 May 1970 |
Citation | 34 A.D.2d 831,312 N.Y.S.2d 644 |
Parties | The PEOPLE etc., Respondent, v. James Troy HICKMAN, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Thomas J. Mackell, Dist. Atty. of Queens County, for respondent; Constance M. Mandina, Asst. Dist. Atty., of counsel.
Milton Adler, New York City, for defendant-appellant; Harry C. Batchelder, Jr., New York City, of counsel.
Before CHRIST, P.J., and MUNDER, MARTUSCELLO, LATHAM and KLEINFELD, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 23, 1968, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered.The findings of fact below are affirmed.
We believe the prosecutor's summation to the jury went far beyond the bounds of fair play and violated defendant's right to a fair trial (People v. Lombardi, 20 N.Y.2d 266, 282 N.Y.S.2d 519, 229 N.E.2d 206).His references to defendant as a 'junkie', 'rat' and a 'sculptor' with a knife, among others, as well as his suppositions as to defendant's state of mind on the night in question and defendant's actions had he remained in the tavern a while longer, were...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Coxwell v. State
...("punk, hood and bum"); People v. Matthews, 33 A.D.2d 679, 305 N.Y.S.2d 919 (1969), ("attack on defense lawyer"); People v. Hickman, 34 A.D.2d 831, 312 N.Y.S.2d 644 (1970) ("junkie, rat and sculptor with a knife, et al."); State v. Foster, 2 N.C.App. 109, 162 S.E.2d 583 (1968) ("Professiona......
-
People v. Daniels
...than that in the future.' Such improper statements by a prosecutor in his summation have been condemned by the courts (People v. Hickman, 34 A.D.2d 831, 312 N.Y.S.2d 644; People v. Fields, 27 A.D.2d 736, 277 N.Y.S.2d ...
-
Commonwealth v. Hubbard
... ... credibility of witnesses. See United States v ... Schartner, 426 F.2d 470, 478 (3d Cir. 1970); People ... v. Lombardi, 20 N.Y.2d 266, 282 N.Y.S.2d 519, 229 N.E.2d ... 206 (1967); Commonwealth v. Maloney, 365 Pa. 1, 5, ... 73 A.2d 707, 709 (1950); eople v. Reese, 220 ... Cal.App.2d 143, 33 Cal.Rptr. 561 (1963); People v ... Hickman, 34 A.D.2d 831, 312 N.Y.S.2d 644 (1970)." ... Commonwealth ... v. Potter, 445 Pa. 284, 286-7, 285 A.2d 492, 493 (1971) ... We have also ... ...
-
People v. Arce
...vouched for the honesty of several prosecution witnesses (see People v. Figueroa, 38 A.D.2d 595, 328 N.Y.S.2d 514; People v. Hickman, 34 A.D.2d 831, 312 N.Y.S.2d 644). I am particularly disturbed by his admonition to the jury that it should not be bothered by the doctrine of reasonable 'Not......
-
18.57 - G. Avoiding The Commission Of Reversible Error By Making Improper Comments
...People v. Puglisi, 44 N.Y.2d 748, 405 N.Y.S.2d 680 (1978); People v. Bailey, 58 N.Y.2d 272, 460 N.Y.S.2d 912 (1983); People v. Hickman, 34 A.D.2d 831, 312 N.Y.S.2d 644 (2d Dep’t 1970); People v. Blackman, 43 A.D.2d 742, 350 N.Y.S.2d 715 (2d Dep’t 1973); People v. Figueroa, 38 A.D.2d 595, 32......
-
I. Summation
...A.D.3d 1258, 39 N.Y.S.3d 340 (4th Dep't 2016).[674] People v. Christman, 23 N.Y.2d 429, 297 N.Y.S.2d 134 (1969). [675] People v. Hickman, 34 A.D.2d 831, 312 N.Y.S.2d 644 (2d Dep't 1970); see People v. Goggins, 64 A.D.2d 717, 407 N.Y.S.2d 531 (2d Dep't 1978); People v. Rogers, 59 A.D.2d 916,......