People v. Hicks
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | Simons |
| Citation | People v. Hicks, 647 N.Y.S.2d 170, 88 N.Y.2d 937 (N.Y. 1996) |
| Decision Date | 17 June 1996 |
| Parties | , 670 N.E.2d 454 People v. William Hicks |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
2 cases
-
People v. Brooks
... ... Campbell, 97 N.Y.2d at 533–534, 743 N.Y.S.2d 396, 769 N.E.2d 1288;People v. Ball, 68 A.D.3d 1148, 1149, 889 N.Y.S.2d 745 [2009];People v. Arroyo, 22 A.D.3d 881, 882, 802 N.Y.S.2d 552 [2005],lv. denied6 N.Y.3d 773, 811 N.Y.S.2d 340, 844 N.E.2d 795 [2006];People v. Hicks, 226 A.D.2d 938, 941, 641 N.Y.S.2d 161 [1996],lv. denied88 N.Y.2d 937, 647 N.Y.S.2d 170, 670 N.E.2d 454 [1996] ). Finally, although defendant's challenge to the severity of his sentence is not precluded by his appeal waiver ( see People v. O'Connell, 80 A.D.3d 1007, 1007, 915 ... ...
-
People v. Kaufman
... ... We do not disturb the court's determination that defendant's statements were the result of a single continuous chain of events (see, People v Chapple, 38 N.Y.2d 112, 115; see generally, People v Prochilo, supra, at 761; cf., People v Smith, 275 A.D.2d 951, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 739; People v Hicks, 226 A.D.2d 938, 939-940, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 937; People v Jacobs, 136 A.D.2d 796, 797-798). However, we agree with the court that, "[o]n this record, the voluntariness of the defendant's [second and third written] statements was so apparent that [they] need not be suppressed because of the ... ...
