People v. Hollis

Decision Date18 June 1992
Docket NumberNo. S024315,S024315
Citation9 Cal.Rptr.2d 92,831 P.2d 317
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
PartiesPEOPLE, Respondent, v. Thurston Sonrea HOLLIS, Appellant.

Prior report: Cal.App., 1 Cal.Rptr.2d 524.

Pursuant to Rule 29.4(c), California Rules of Court, the above-entitled review is DISMISSED and cause is remanded to the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Four.

Pursuant to this court's order of May 7, 1992, the opinion is to remain published.

LUCAS, C.J., and MOSK, PANELLI, KENNARD, ARABIAN, BAXTER and GEORGE, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
365 cases
  • Ivanoff v. Bank of Am., N.A., B271035
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 13 Marzo 2017
  • Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. v. Am. Asphalt S., Inc., S225398
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • 16 Febrero 2017
  • A.J. Fistes Corp. v. GDL Best Contractors, Inc.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 16 Julio 2019
    ......1247, 218 Cal.Rptr.3d 394, 395 P.3d 274 ; accord, People ex rel. Becerra v. Superior Court (2018) 29 Cal.App.5th 486, 495, 240 Cal.Rptr.3d 250 [" ......
  • Foster v. Sexton
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 16 Marzo 2021
    ...68 Cal.Rptr.3d 295, 171 P.3d 20, citing 61 Cal.App.5th 1025 Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 971, 9 Cal.Rptr.2d 92, 831 P.2d 317.) Because motions for judgment on the pleadings are reviewed on appeal under the same rules applied to demurrers ( Angelucci, supra , 41 Cal......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Joyce L. Kennard: an independent streak on California's highest court.
    • United States
    • Albany Law Review Vol. 65 No. 4, June - June 2002
    • 22 Junio 2002
    ...of Sacramento v. State, 785 P.2d 522 (Cal. 1990) (Kaufman, J., concurring and dissenting)). (94) See, e.g., Aubry v. Tri-City Hosp. Dist., 831 P.2d 317, 324 (Cal. 1992) (Kennard, J., dissenting) (believing instead that the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) should be able to rec......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT