People v. Hollis, No. S024315

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court (California)
Writing for the CourtLUCAS
Citation9 Cal.Rptr.2d 92,831 P.2d 317
PartiesPEOPLE, Respondent, v. Thurston Sonrea HOLLIS, Appellant.
Decision Date18 June 1992
Docket NumberNo. S024315

Page 92

9 Cal.Rptr.2d 92
831 P.2d 317
PEOPLE, Respondent,
v.
Thurston Sonrea HOLLIS, Appellant.
No. S024315.
Supreme Court of California,
In Bank.
June 18, 1992.

Prior report: Cal.App., 1 Cal.Rptr.2d 524.

Pursuant to Rule 29.4(c), California Rules of Court, the above-entitled review is DISMISSED and cause is remanded to the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Four.

Pursuant to this court's order of May 7, 1992, the opinion is to remain published.

LUCAS, C.J., and MOSK, PANELLI, KENNARD, ARABIAN, BAXTER and GEORGE, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
357 practice notes
  • Gutierrez v. Carmax Auto Superstores Cal., F073215
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • January 30, 2018
    ...at p. 870, 62 Cal.Rptr.3d 614, 161 P.3d 1168, italics added; Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 967, 9 Cal.Rptr.2d 92, 831 P.2d 317 [any possible legal theory].) The term "any" is a broad term that ordinarily means " ‘of whatever kind’ " or " ‘without restriction.’ " ( Z......
  • San Remo Hotel v. SAN FRACISCO CITY & CTY, No. S091757.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • March 4, 2002
    ...Corp. (1997) 14 Cal.4th 1247, 1253, 61 Cal.Rptr.2d 112, 931 P.2d 290; Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 966-967, 9 Cal. Rptr.2d 92, 831 P.2d Plaintiffs allege the following as to the hotel's legal status and history. "From 1916 to the present, the guest rooms in the San......
  • Shamsian v. Department of Conservation, No. B184680.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • February 7, 2006
    ...Cal.4th 1112, 1126, 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 709, 45 P.3d 1171; Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 966-967, 9 Cal.Rptr.2d 92, 831 P.2d 317; Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318, 216 Cal.Rptr. 718, 703 P.2d 58.) In addition, whether section 14501, subdivision (g) imposes a ma......
  • Ivanoff v. Bank of Am., N.A., B271035
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • March 13, 2017
    ...a plaintiff to amend his [or her] complaint." ’ " (Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 970-971, 9 Cal.Rptr.2d 92, 831 P.2d 317.) We determine whether the plaintiff has shown "in what manner he [or she] can amend [the] complaint and how that amendment will change the legal......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
356 cases
  • Gutierrez v. Carmax Auto Superstores Cal., F073215
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • January 30, 2018
    ...at p. 870, 62 Cal.Rptr.3d 614, 161 P.3d 1168, italics added; Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 967, 9 Cal.Rptr.2d 92, 831 P.2d 317 [any possible legal theory].) The term "any" is a broad term that ordinarily means " ‘of whatever kind’ " or " ‘wi......
  • San Remo Hotel v. SAN FRACISCO CITY & CTY, No. S091757.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • March 4, 2002
    ...Corp. (1997) 14 Cal.4th 1247, 1253, 61 Cal.Rptr.2d 112, 931 P.2d 290; Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 966-967, 9 Cal. Rptr.2d 92, 831 P.2d Plaintiffs allege the following as to the hotel's legal status and history. "From 1916 to the present, the guest rooms in th......
  • Shamsian v. Department of Conservation, No. B184680.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • February 7, 2006
    ...Cal.4th 1112, 1126, 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 709, 45 P.3d 1171; Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 966-967, 9 Cal.Rptr.2d 92, 831 P.2d 317; Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318, 216 Cal.Rptr. 718, 703 P.2d 58.) In addition, whether section 14501, subdivision (g) imposes a ma......
  • Ivanoff v. Bank of Am., N.A., B271035
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • March 13, 2017
    ...to amend his [or her] complaint." ’ " (Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 970-971, 9 Cal.Rptr.2d 92, 831 P.2d 317.) We determine whether the plaintiff has shown "in what manner he [or she] can amend [the] complaint and how that amendment will change the le......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT