People v. Hopkins, S183724.

Decision Date28 July 2010
Docket NumberNo. S183724.,S183724.
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
PartiesPEOPLEv.HOPKINS (Jason).

Prior report: Cal.App., 109 Cal.Rptr.3d 214.

Petition for review granted; briefing deferred.

The petition for review is granted.

Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in People v. Brown, 110 Cal.Rptr.3d 611, 232 P.3d 611 (2010) (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.524(c)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.528, is deferred pending further order of the court.

GEORGE, C.J., was absent and did not participate.

CORRIGAN, A.C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, and MORENO, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
188 cases
  • People v. Fultz
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • September 27, 2021
    ...witness's credibility would have undermined a critical element of the prosecution's case...." ’ " ( People v. Letner and Tobin (2010) 50 Cal.4th 99, 177, 112 Cal.Rptr.3d 746, 235 P.3d 62.) A new trial is generally not required when other evidence corroborates the witness's testimony. ( Sala......
  • People v. Johnson
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • January 14, 2016
    ...But it did not "have the effect of excluding defense evidence," and was not error. (Ibid. ; see People v. Letner and Tobin (2010) 50 Cal.4th 99, 187, 112 Cal.Rptr.3d 746, 235 P.3d 62 [even if instructions on voluntary intoxication were inadequate, error harmless where, among other things, p......
  • People v. Nash
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • August 3, 2020
    ...rather than by language parsed from an appellate court opinion and questioned by our high court. ( People v. Letner and Tobin (2010) 50 Cal.4th 99, 197–198, 112 Cal.Rptr.3d 746, 235 P.3d 62, quoting Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450, 455, 20 Cal.Rptr. 321, 369 P......
  • People v. Vargas
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • July 13, 2020
    ...appl[ies] it to the facts in order to determine whether the law as applied has been violated.’ " ( People v. Letner and Tobin (2010) 50 Cal.4th 99, 145, 112 Cal.Rptr.3d 746, 235 P.3d 62.) We review de novo a trial court's resolution of the legal questions resolved in a suppression motion, a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases null
    • United States
    • Full Court Press California Guide to Criminal Evidence Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...Cal. Rptr. 3d 131, 223 P.3d 3 (2010)—Ch. 5-B, §1; C, §1; §2.2.1(2)(a) People v. Letner and Tobin, 50 Cal. 4th 99, 112 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746, 235 P.3d 62 (2010)—Ch. 5-A, §3.2.2(1)(a) People v. Lew, 68 Cal. 2d 774, 69 Cal. Rptr. 102, 441 P.2d 942 (1968)—Ch. 3-B, §2.2.2(1)(c)[2] People v. Lewis, 1......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT