People v. Hopkins, S183724.
Decision Date | 28 July 2010 |
Docket Number | No. S183724.,S183724. |
Court | California Supreme Court |
Parties | PEOPLEv.HOPKINS (Jason). |
Prior report: Cal.App., 109 Cal.Rptr.3d 214.
Petition for review granted; briefing deferred.
The petition for review is granted.
Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in People v. Brown, 110 Cal.Rptr.3d 611, 232 P.3d 611 (2010) (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.524(c)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.528, is deferred pending further order of the court.
GEORGE, C.J., was absent and did not participate.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Fultz
...witness's credibility would have undermined a critical element of the prosecution's case...." ’ " ( People v. Letner and Tobin (2010) 50 Cal.4th 99, 177, 112 Cal.Rptr.3d 746, 235 P.3d 62.) A new trial is generally not required when other evidence corroborates the witness's testimony. ( Sala......
-
People v. Johnson
...But it did not "have the effect of excluding defense evidence," and was not error. (Ibid. ; see People v. Letner and Tobin (2010) 50 Cal.4th 99, 187, 112 Cal.Rptr.3d 746, 235 P.3d 62 [even if instructions on voluntary intoxication were inadequate, error harmless where, among other things, p......
-
People v. Nash
...rather than by language parsed from an appellate court opinion and questioned by our high court. ( People v. Letner and Tobin (2010) 50 Cal.4th 99, 197–198, 112 Cal.Rptr.3d 746, 235 P.3d 62, quoting Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450, 455, 20 Cal.Rptr. 321, 369 P......
-
People v. Vargas
...appl[ies] it to the facts in order to determine whether the law as applied has been violated.’ " ( People v. Letner and Tobin (2010) 50 Cal.4th 99, 145, 112 Cal.Rptr.3d 746, 235 P.3d 62.) We review de novo a trial court's resolution of the legal questions resolved in a suppression motion, a......
-
Table of Cases null
...Cal. Rptr. 3d 131, 223 P.3d 3 (2010)—Ch. 5-B, §1; C, §1; §2.2.1(2)(a) People v. Letner and Tobin, 50 Cal. 4th 99, 112 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746, 235 P.3d 62 (2010)—Ch. 5-A, §3.2.2(1)(a) People v. Lew, 68 Cal. 2d 774, 69 Cal. Rptr. 102, 441 P.2d 942 (1968)—Ch. 3-B, §2.2.2(1)(c)[2] People v. Lewis, 1......