People v. Howard, Docket No. 10637

Decision Date19 January 1972
Docket NumberNo. 3,Docket No. 10637,3
Citation195 N.W.2d 289,37 Mich.App. 662
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John HOWARD, Defendant-Appellant
CourtCourt of Appeal of Michigan — District of US

James A. Brisbois, Saginaw, for defendant-appellant.

Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Derengoski, Sol. Gen., George E. Thick, II, Pros. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before R. B. BURNS, P.J., and FITZGERALD and V. J. BRENNAN, JJ.

V. J. BRENNAN, Judge.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of two counts of first-degree murder (M.C.L.A. § 750.316; M.S.A. § 28.548). Prior to his trial, defendant's attorneys moved to have him committed in order that his competency to stand trial be determined as provided by GCR 1963, 786.3. The court originally ordered such a commitment, but subsequently amended its order to provide that defendant be examined by a local clinical psychologist, the purpose being to determine whether commitment to a diagnostic facility was necessary to determine defendant's competency.

We feel the judge's actions in this regard were erroneous and reversible. The court rule (GCR 1963, 786.3) is mandatory. Whenever there is any question as to a defendant's competency to stand trial, and that question is raised upon defendant's motion, the court 'shall' order the defendant committed to a diagnostic facility. People v. Ledbetter, 31 Mich.App. 160, 187 N.W.2d 507 (1971).

Reversed and remanded for commitment to a diagnostic institution and for a new trial.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • People v. Butler, Docket No. 10985
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • October 24, 1972
    ...of forensic psychiatric evaluation.' (Emphasis supplied.) The procedure detailed in the court rule is mandatory. People v. Howard, 37 Mich.App. 662, 195 N.W.2d 289 (1972). It 'must be followed when the question of defendant's competency to stand trial is properly raised.' People v. Kerridge......
  • People v. Blocker
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • February 22, 1973
    ...v. Hartford, 25 Mich.App. 200, 181 N.W.2d 24 (1970); People v. Ledbetter, 31 Mich.App. 160, 187 N.W.2d 507 (1971); People v. Howard, 37 Mich.App. 662, 195 N.W.2d 289 (1972); People v. Goodall, 37 Mich.App. 223, 194 N.W.2d 454 (1971); People v. Jackson, 40 Mich.App. 237, 198 N.W.2d 714 (1972......
  • People v. Spry
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • March 30, 1977
    ...held that the filing of a motion by defendant itself requires commitment of the accused for psychiatric evaluation. People v. Howard, 37 Mich.App. 662, 195 N.W.2d 289 (1972); People v. Leffew, 58 Mich.App. 533, 228 N.W.2d 449 (1975). We conclude that a recent trilogy of Michigan Supreme Cou......
  • People v. Plummer, Docket No. 10606
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • January 19, 1972
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT