People v. Jackson
Decision Date | 24 February 1981 |
Citation | 438 N.Y.S.2d 299,52 N.Y.2d 1027,420 N.E.2d 97 |
Parties | , 420 N.E.2d 97 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert JACKSON, Appellant. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division, 74 A.D.2d 585, 424 N.Y.S.2d 484, should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division. In light of appellant's emphasis on his trial attorney's introduction of evidence relating to a photograph array in which defendant's picture was not included and the Appellate Division's notation of, but failure to comment upon, that fact, we add that in the dilemma trial counsel faced, defendant's alibi defense being tainted by the fact that one of his alibi witnesses had originally accused defendant of committing the crime, counsel's decision to risk use of the photo array evidence was at most a mistaken judgment as to trial strategy and cannot be characterized as ineffective assistance of counsel (compare People v. Bell, 48 N.Y.2d 933, 935, 425 N.Y.S.2d 57, 401 N.E.2d 180; People v. Aiken, 45 N.Y.2d 394, 408 N.Y.S.2d 444, 380 N.E.2d 272).
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Marquez v. State
......2 (1982). The general rule, however, is that withdrawal of the waiver is within the "sound discretion" of the trial court. People v. Chambers, 7 Cal.3d 666, 102 Cal.Rptr. 776, 778, 498 P.2d 1024, 1026 (Cal.1972). Colorado R.S.A. § 18-1-406(3). State v. Rankin, 102 Conn. 46, ......
-
Henry v. Poole
......Think about it, ladies and gentlemen. I submit to you, if you do, you will come to the only conclusion possible, and that is that the People have failed to prove my client's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. . (Tr. 334.) . But Watts acknowledged that the ...Jackson, 52 N.Y.2d 1027, 1029, 438 N.Y.S.2d 299, 420 N.E.2d 97). . Henry II, 95 N.Y.2d at 566, 721 N.Y.S.2d at 578-79, 744 N.E.2d 112 ......
-
Rosario v. Ercole
......He directly appealed his judgment and conviction to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department, People v. Rosario, 288 A.D.2d 142, 733 N.Y.S.2d 405 (1st Dep't 2001), and on March 26, 2002, was denied leave to review by the New York Court of Appeals. ...United States, 186 F.3d 275, 281-82 (2d Cir.1999); McKee v. United States, 167 F.3d 103, 106-07 (2d Cir.1999); Jackson v. Leonardo, 162 F.3d 81, 85 (2d Cir.1998). . In determining whether counsel's performance was objectively deficient, courts "must ......
- People v. Miller