People v. Jackson

Decision Date24 February 1981
Citation438 N.Y.S.2d 299,52 N.Y.2d 1027,420 N.E.2d 97
Parties, 420 N.E.2d 97 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert JACKSON, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
Brent K. Olsson, Brooklyn, and William E. Hellerstein, New York City, for appellant.
OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division, 74 A.D.2d 585, 424 N.Y.S.2d 484, should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division. In light of appellant's emphasis on his trial attorney's introduction of evidence relating to a photograph array in which defendant's picture was not included and the Appellate Division's notation of, but failure to comment upon, that fact, we add that in the dilemma trial counsel faced, defendant's alibi defense being tainted by the fact that one of his alibi witnesses had originally accused defendant of committing the crime, counsel's decision to risk use of the photo array evidence was at most a mistaken judgment as to trial strategy and cannot be characterized as ineffective assistance of counsel (compare People v. Bell, 48 N.Y.2d 933, 935, 425 N.Y.S.2d 57, 401 N.E.2d 180; People v. Aiken, 45 N.Y.2d 394, 408 N.Y.S.2d 444, 380 N.E.2d 272).

COOKE, C. J., and JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

To continue reading

Request your trial
61 cases
  • Marquez v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • April 3, 1996
    ......2 (1982). The general rule, however, is that withdrawal of the waiver is within the "sound discretion" of the trial court. People v. Chambers, 7 Cal.3d 666, 102 Cal.Rptr. 776, 778, 498 P.2d 1024, 1026 (Cal.1972). Colorado R.S.A. § 18-1-406(3). State v. Rankin, 102 Conn. 46, ......
  • Henry v. Poole
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • May 24, 2005
    ......Think about it, ladies and gentlemen. I submit to you, if you do, you will come to the only conclusion possible, and that is that the People have failed to prove my client's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. .         (Tr. 334.) .         But Watts acknowledged that the ...Jackson, 52 N.Y.2d 1027, 1029, 438 N.Y.S.2d 299, 420 N.E.2d 97). .          Henry II, 95 N.Y.2d at 566, 721 N.Y.S.2d at 578-79, 744 N.E.2d 112 ......
  • Rosario v. Ercole
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • October 22, 2008
    ......He directly appealed his judgment and conviction to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department, People v. Rosario, 288 A.D.2d 142, 733 N.Y.S.2d 405 (1st Dep't 2001), and on March 26, 2002, was denied leave to review by the New York Court of Appeals. ...United States, 186 F.3d 275, 281-82 (2d Cir.1999); McKee v. United States, 167 F.3d 103, 106-07 (2d Cir.1999); Jackson v. Leonardo, 162 F.3d 81, 85 (2d Cir.1998). .         In determining whether counsel's performance was objectively deficient, courts "must ......
  • People v. Miller
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • September 24, 1990
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT