People v. Jackson

CourtIllinois Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtDAILY
CitationPeople v. Jackson, 179 N.E.2d 9, 23 Ill.2d 475 (Ill. 1961)
Decision Date30 November 1961
Docket NumberNo. 36124,36124
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Clifford JACKSON, Plaintiff in Error.

Clifford Jackson, pro se.

DAILY, Justice.

Defendant, Clifford Jackson, who was represented by counsel and fully admonished by the trial court, waived prosecution by indictment (Ill.Rev.Stat.1959, chap. 38, par. 702), and pleaded guilty to an information for burglary in the circuit court of Winnebago County. He was sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of not less than five nor more than fifteen years and, presenting only the common-law record, he now prosecutes this writ of error to review that judgment.

For his first contention defendant asserts, completely dehors the record and in contradiction of the allegations in the information, that the building he was charged with burglarizing did not lie either within the State of Illinois or the county of Winnebago, with the result that the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the cause. In light of the allegations of the information it is clear that we may not properly consider this argument. On writ of error, the common-law record imports verity and cannot be impeached, contradicted or amended except by reason of other matters of record. (People v. Jones, 9 Ill.2d 481, 138 N.E.2d 522; People v. Brown, 3 Ill.2d 623, 122 N.E.2d 153; People v. Connors, 413 Ill. 386, 108 N.E.2d 774.) If the point has any foundation or merit, defendant is not without a remedy but may secure relief by a motion in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis. Ill.Rev.Stat.1959, chap. 110, par. 72; People v. Bishop, 1 Ill.2d 60, 114 N.E.2d 566; People v. Loftus, 400 Ill. 432, 81 N.E.2d 495.

Finally, it is contended that the information was defective because it did not properly identify or particularize the location of the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • People v. Harden
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Illinois
    • December 29, 1966
    ...a plea, a petition in Habeas corpus, a petition in post-conviction proceedings, a petition in the nature of Coram nobis, People v. Jackson, 23 Ill.2d 475, 179 N.E.2d 9, or under our Civil Practice Act, Chap. 110, sec. 72 (Ill.Rev.Stat., 1963); Withers v. People, 23 Ill.2d 131, 177 N.E.2d 20......
  • People v. King
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Illinois
    • July 15, 1964
    ...196 N.E.2d at page 484 in the following terms: 'Cases like People v. Garkus, 358 Ill. 406 [sic, 106], 192 N.E. 653, and People v. Jackson, 23 Ill.2d 475, 179 N.E.2d 9, in which the alleged defect was not raised by motion to quash or motion in arrest of judgment, or was waived by a plea of g......
  • People v. Powell
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Illinois
    • July 20, 1965
    ...196 N.E.2d at page 484 in the following terms: 'Cases like People v. Garkus, 358, Ill. 406 [sic, 106], 192 N.E. 653, and People v. Jackson, 23 Ill.2d 475, 179 N.E.2d 9, in which the alleged defect was not raised by motion to quash or motion in arrest of judgment, or was waived by a plea of ......
  • People v. Woods
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • November 30, 1961
  • Get Started for Free