People v. Jamieson

Decision Date26 December 1989
Docket NumberNo. 83446,83446
CitationPeople v. Jamieson, 456 N.W.2d 390, 433 Mich. 1226 (Mich. 1989)
PartiesPEOPLE v. JAMIESON. 433 Mich. 1226, 456 N.W.2d 390
CourtMichigan Supreme Court

Reported below: 168 Mich.App. 332, 423 N.W.2d 655.

ORDER OF RESUBMISSION.

The parties are to submit supplemental briefs on the question whether the Supreme Court, for purposes of claims of entrapment, should adopt the "subjective test" as defined in the majority opinions in United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423, 93 S.Ct. 1637, 36 L.Ed.2d 366(1973), andSorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435, 53 S.Ct. 210, 77 L.Ed. 413(1932).The case is to be reargued and resubmitted.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • Mack v. City of Detroit
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • 31 July 2002
    ... ... 655, 545 N.W.2d 351 (1996), overruling Weinberg v. Univ. of Michigan Regents, 97 Mich. 246, 56 N.W. 605 (1893); People v. Kevorkian, 447 Mich. 436, 527 N.W.2d 714 (1994), overruling People v. Roberts, 211 Mich. 187, 178 N.W. 690 (1920); In re Hatcher, 443 Mich ... However, when Justice CAVANAGH was in the majority, the Court asked the parties to do the very same thing in People v. Jamieson, 436 Mich. 61, 461 N.W.2d 884 (1990) ... 433 Mich. 1226, 456 N.W.2d 390 (1989) ...         Finally, we note that in regard to the majority ... ...
  • People v. Jamieson
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • 12 September 1990
    ...briefs with regard to whether we should abandon the objective entrapment test in preference to the subjective test. 433 Mich. 1226, 456 N.W.2d 390 (1989). We have concluded that there is not sufficient justification or need to change a well-settled principle of law in this state. On the bas......