People v. Jamieson
| Decision Date | 26 December 1989 |
| Docket Number | No. 83446,83446 |
| Citation | 456 N.W.2d 390,433 Mich. 1226 |
| Parties | PEOPLE v. JAMIESON. 433 Mich. 1226, 456 N.W.2d 390 |
| Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Reported below: 168 Mich.App. 332, 423 N.W.2d 655.
ORDER OF RESUBMISSION.
The parties are to submit supplemental briefs on the question whether the Supreme Court, for purposes of claims of entrapment, should adopt the "subjective test" as defined in the majority opinions in United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423, 93 S.Ct. 1637, 36 L.Ed.2d 366 (1973), and Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435, 53 S.Ct. 210, 77 L.Ed. 413 (1932). The case is to be reargued and resubmitted.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Mack v. City of Detroit
... ... 655, 545 N.W.2d 351 (1996), overruling Weinberg v. Univ. of Michigan Regents, 97 Mich. 246, 56 N.W. 605 (1893); People v. Kevorkian, 447 Mich. 436, 527 N.W.2d 714 (1994), overruling People v. Roberts, 211 Mich. 187, 178 N.W. 690 (1920); In re Hatcher, 443 Mich ... However, when Justice CAVANAGH was in the majority, the Court asked the parties to do the very same thing in People v. Jamieson, 436 Mich. 61, 461 N.W.2d 884 (1990) ... 433 Mich. 1226, 456 N.W.2d 390 (1989) ... Finally, we note that in regard to the majority ... ...
-
People v. Jamieson
...briefs with regard to whether we should abandon the objective entrapment test in preference to the subjective test. 433 Mich. 1226, 456 N.W.2d 390 (1989). We have concluded that there is not sufficient justification or need to change a well-settled principle of law in this state. On the bas......