People v. Joines

Decision Date27 June 1974
Docket NumberNo. 55686,55686
Citation219 N.W.2d 432,392 Mich. 764
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Lee JOINES, Defendant-Appellant. 392 Mich. 764, 219 N.W.2d 432
CourtMichigan Supreme Court

Before the Entire Bench.

ORDER

On order of the Court, the in pro. per. petition for writ of habeas corpus by defendant-appellant is treated as a delayed application for leave to appeal and, so treated and considered, the same is hereby granted.The Court, sua sponte pursuant to GCR 1963, 865.1(7), hereby remands the cause to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in view of People v. White, 390 Mich. 245, 212 N.W.2d 222(1973).

FITZGERALD, J., not participating.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Michigan v. Mosley
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • December 9, 1975
    ...statement be suppressed as evidence. 51 Mich.App. 105, 214 N.W.2d 564. After further appeal was denied by the Michigan Supreme Court, 392 Mich. 764, the State filed a petition for certiorari here. We granted the writ because of the important constitutional question presented. 419 U.S. 1119,......
  • Watson v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • December 14, 1988
    ...and reversed, People v. Mosley, 51 Mich.App. 105, 214 N.W.2d 564 (1974); 3 further review was denied by the Michigan Supreme Court, 392 Mich. 764 (1974). Id., 423 U.S., at 98-99, 96 S.Ct., at Having granted certiorari, the Supreme Court framed its issue as follows: "[W]hether the conduct of......
  • People v. Markham
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • August 27, 1976
    ...(1967)) would be applied prospectively: 'the processing of current criminal calendars would be disrupted.'16 390 Mich. 809 (1973); 392 Mich. 764 (1974).17 People v. Joines (On Remand), 55 Mich.App. 334, 222 N.W.2d 230 (1974); People v. Davenport (On Remand), 51 Mich.App. 484, 215 N.W.2d 702......
  • Keating Intern. Corp. v. Orion County
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • December 18, 1975
    ...upon competent, material and substantial evidence. The trial court was therefore affirmed. We granted leave to appeal June 27, 1974. 392 Mich. 764. II--EFFECT OF I concur with the Court of Appeals and find that the trial judge erred in failing to consider the amended zoning ordinance. 'A fu......
  • Get Started for Free