People v. Jones

Decision Date29 June 1881
Citation46 Mich. 441,9 N.W. 486
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
PartiesPEOPLE v. JONES.

A pickpocket placing his hands in the pocket of a person may be convicted of an attempt to commit larceny from the person, although there is no property in such pocket that could be taken therefrom. The intent may be inferred from the act done.

Appeal from recorder's court, Detroit.

Jacob J. Van Riper, for plaintiff.

D.E. Prescott, for defendant.

MARSTON, C.J.

The respondent was charged with and convicted of an attempt to commit a larceny from the person, and the proof tended to show that he had put his hand into the outside cloak pocket of Emma Bellair; that there was no property of any kind in the pocket at that time and nothing therefore was taken therefrom. It was claimed that under such circumstances he could not be convicted. We are of a contrary opinion. The charge is of an attempt to commit a crime. In burglary, and many cases of attempts, the intent is gathered from the taking or other act done. But this is not the only way of proving the intent; if it were, in many cases attempts to commit crime would go unpunished. We fully concur in the views expressed by the Massachusetts court in Commissioners v. McDonald, 5 Cush. 365. We think this is not only the better, but the only rule of law that could be adopted or recognized with safety to the rights of the public or of individuals.

It must be certified to the recorder's court that we discover no error in the record, and that court is advised to proceed to judgment.

(The other justices concurred.)

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • People v. Thousand
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • July 27, 2001
    ...convicted of attempted abortion; at common law the general rule is that while factual impossibility is not a defense (People v. Jones, 46 Mich. 441, 9 N.W. 486 [1881])14, legal impossibility is a defense. LaFave & Scott, Criminal Law, § 62, p. 474. [Emphasis As is readily apparent, our stat......
  • People v. Page
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • March 1, 1977
    ...decision in People v. Ora Jones, 395 Mich. 379, 236 N.W.2d 461 (1975). The instant decision demands careful analysis of these decisions. In Jones, the Court explained the trial judge's duty to instruct on lesser included "The duty of the trial judge to instruct on lesser included offenses i......
  • People v. Rollino
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • November 5, 1962
    ...an empty pocket (People v. Moran, 123 N.Y. 254, 25 N.E. 412, 10 L.R.A. 109; Commonwealth v. McDonald, 5 Cush. 365 (Mass.); People v. Jones, 46 Mich. 441, 9 N.W. 486). (b) An attempt to steal from an empty receptacle (Clark v. State, 86 Tenn. 511, 8 S.W. 145) or an empty house (State v. Utle......
  • State v. Elliott
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • November 23, 1955
    ...412, 10 L.R.A. 109, 20 Am.St.Rep. 732; Commonwealth v. McDonald, 5 Cush. 365, 59 Mass. 365; State v. Wilson, 30 Conn. 500; People v. Jones, 46 Mich. 441, 9 N.W. 486. See, also, Rogers v. Commonwealth, 5 Serg. & R., Pa., 463; State v. Beal, 37 Ohio St. 108, 41 Am.Rep. 490; 1 Burdick, The Law......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT