People v. Karste
Decision Date | 23 March 1903 |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Parties | PEOPLE v. KARSTE. |
Exceptions from Circuit Court, Gogebic County; Joseph H. Steere, Judge.
Otto E Karste was convicted of misapplying money placed in his hands for investment, and he brings exceptions. Affirmed.
Charles E. Miller, for appellant.
Horace M. Oren, Atty. Gen., and Samuel S. Cooper, Pros. Atty. (Allan F. Rees, of counsel), for the People.
The respondent was convicted under an information based on section 11,572 of the Compiled Laws. On the trial the evidence showed the following facts: Cecil S. Wray in October and November, 1900, resided at Iron Belt, Wis., about nine miles from the city of Ironwood, and on the 13th of October he wrote a letter to the defendant as follows: Inclosed in such letter was a check upon the Savings & Trust Company, Cleveland, Ohio, payable to the order of O. E. Karste or bearer, for $350, on deposit, and the number 9,187, which check was signed Mrs. Eliza Wray. The testimony showed that this money was Mrs. Eliza Wray's money, and the Cecil S. Wray received from Karste a reply to his letter of October 13th, which is as follows Aside from these letters, there was no communication between Cecil S. Wray and Karste previous to November 13th; but Wray was in Ironwood once or twice during that time, and asked Karste if he had been able to procure the stock for his mother. Wray merely asked him if he had the stock, and he would say 'No,' and they would probably converse upon something else for a minute or two. The next communication between the parties was a telegram dated November 13th, and sent from Edinburgh, Ind., which telegram was as follows: Wray also wrote Karste on the 14th of November as follows: Wray received from Karste, in reply to this telegram and letter, a letter as follows: In response to this last letter Wray wrote the respondent that he need not send check until final settlement was made, or until after respondent had purchased the American Steel & Wire Company stock. This letter was written November 20th, but before this day respondent had left Ironwood and gone to New York; and the next information that Wray received was a letter from respondent's attorney, stating that he had failed, and proposing a settlement by note.
The case was put to the jury under two counts of the information each of which counted upon a conversion of the $350 in violation of the instructions given in the telegram of November 13th, and confirmed by the letter of November 14th. A motion was made to quash the information on the...
To continue reading
Request your trial