People v. Kirzoncic
| Citation | 975 N.Y.S.2d 890,112 A.D.3d 651,2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 08099 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Robert M. KIRZONCIC, Jr., appellant. |
| Decision Date | 04 December 2013 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Defazio & Zeidan, LLP, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Anthony M. Defazio of counsel), for appellant.
William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Bridget Rahilly Steller of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from an amended sentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), imposed July 18, 2013, on the ground that the amended sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the amended sentence is affirmed.
The amended sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
People v. Ayala
...forfeiting by pleading guilty, the question “you're going to have to waive your right to appeal both the plea and the sentence. Do you [975 N.Y.S.2d 890]understand that?” was insufficient to insure that the defendant grasped the distinction between rights automatically forfeited upon a plea......
-
Kirzoncic v. New York, 15-CV-0789 (KMK)
...No. 8-6).) Following a direct appeal, the Second Department affirmed Petitioner's conviction on December 4, 2013. People v. Kirzoncic, 112 A.D.3d 651 (2d Dep't 2013). Petitioner's leave to file an appeal was denied by the New York Court of Appeals on May 26, 2014. See People v. Kirzoncic, 2......
- Hatch v. Hatch