People v. Landry

Docket NumberS100735
Decision Date12 December 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
16 cases
  • People v. Gomez
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • 29 Noviembre 2018
    ...that ‘the joint trial resulted in such gross unfairness as to amount to a due process violation.’ " ( People v. Landry (2016) 2 Cal.5th 52, 77, 211 Cal.Rptr.3d 160, 385 P.3d 327.)Gomez concedes that all of his counts were properly joined under section 954 and that he should have been tried ......
  • People v. Martinez
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 22 Diciembre 2023
    ...13 Cal.4th at p. 1082.) A fear of future harm will not suffice no matter how great the fear and likelihood of harm. (People v. Landry (2016) 2 Cal.5th 52, 97-98; People v. Manriquez (2005) 37 Cal.4th 547, Perfect Defense of Others Instruction Appellant contends the trial court erred by fail......
  • People v. Smith
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 24 Febrero 2021
    ...that "duress may not be a defense to murder[,] but it may be a defense to premeditation or implied malice." Citing People v. Landry (2016) 2 Cal.5th 52 (Landry) and People v. Hinton (2006) 37 Cal.4th 839 (Hinton), the court explained that duress does not negate malice, although it may negat......
  • People v. Ryan A. (In re Ryan A.)
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 26 Octubre 2023
    ... ... confidential records maintained by a public entity when it ... finds the 'necessity for preserving the confidentiality ... of the information ... outweighs the necessity for disclosure ... in the interest ofjustice.'" ( People v ... Landry (2016) 2 Cal.5th 52, 73.) Further, "Section ... 827 of the Welfare and Institutions Code contains protections ... concerning the confidentiality of juvenile records, whether ... or not they are covered by other state or federal privileges, ... and vests the juvenile court ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases null
    • United States
    • Full Court Press California Guide to Criminal Evidence Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...5-A, §4.2.6 People v. Landers, 31 Cal. App. 5th 288, 242 Cal. Rptr. 3d 501 (1st Dist. 2019)—Ch. 4-C, §1.4.3(1); §5.1 People v. Landry, 2 Cal. 5th 52, 211 Cal. Rptr. 3d 160, 385 P.3d 327 (Cal. 2016)—Ch. 2, §2.1.2(2)(b)[1]; §2.2.1(3); Ch. 4-C, §7.2.3(2); Ch. 7, §3.1.1(3) People v. Lanfrey, 20......
  • Chapter 7 - §3. Types of preliminary fact determinations
    • United States
    • Full Court Press California Guide to Criminal Evidence Chapter 7 Preliminary Fact Determinations
    • Invalid date
    ...of that preliminary fact is governed by Evid. C. §403. See Hart v. Keenan Props, Inc. (2020) 9 Cal.5th 442, 450; People v. Landry (2016) 2 Cal.5th 52, 87; People v. Cruz (4th Dist.2020) 46 Cal.App.5th 715, 729. Some of the circumstances in which this applies include the following: (a) Writi......
  • Chapter 2 - §2. Writings
    • United States
    • Full Court Press California Guide to Criminal Evidence Chapter 2 Foundation
    • Invalid date
    ...evidence to prove the contents of a writing does not eliminate the need to authenticate the secondary evidence. People v. Landry (2016) 2 Cal.5th 52, 86; Goldsmith, 59 Cal.4th at 271; Skiles, 51 Cal.4th at 1187. Secondary evidence, like other evidence of a writing, must be authenticated to ......