People v. Lee

Decision Date19 December 1986
Docket NumberNos. 85-0754,85-3224,s. 85-0754
Citation104 Ill.Dec. 136,502 N.E.2d 399,151 Ill.App.3d 510
Parties, 104 Ill.Dec. 136 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert E. LEE, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

Eugene R. Wedoff, Daniel R. Warren, Jenner & Block, Chicago, for appellant.

Richard M. Daley, State's Atty. (Joan S. Cherry, Peter D. Fischer, Susan Davis Brunner, Asst. State's Attys., of counsel), Chicago, for appellee.

Justice MURRAY delivered the opinion of the court:

This case involves a consolidated appeal by defendant Robert Lee from convictions resulting from two separate trials. In the first case (Lee I), after a jury trial, defendant was convicted of the murder and attempted armed robbery of William Hawbecker and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment for natural life. In the second case (Lee II), defendant was convicted after a bench trial of the attempted murder and armed robbery of Peter Larson and was sentenced to 20-years imprisonment, to run concurrently with the life sentence. The same trial judge presided over both trials. By stipulation of the parties, the evidence in the Lee II trial consisted solely of excerpts from the transcript of the Lee I trial. The two appeals were consolidated since they contain common issues.

The charges against defendant arose out of three separate shootings in Chicago's Uptown area on the evening of January 26, 1984. On that date, Hawbecker was treated for a gunshot wound by Dr. Cathleen Cline at Illinois Masonic Hospital. Hawbecker told the doctor that he had been beat up in the head area and then shot by two men as he was walking down the street sometime between 7:00 and 7:15 p.m. Hawbecker had walked home and was taken to the hospital by a friend. After talking to Dr. Cline, Hawbecker was interviewed by Chicago police officers James Allota and Nick Cesario. He told the officers that he had been shot near 3400 North Lakewood Street by a white male, 16 to 18 years old, who was approximately 5'8"'' with long blond hair and was wearing dark clothes. His assailant fled after the shooting; no robbery took place. The officers then transmitted the description of Hawbecker's assailant, excluding any reference to his clothing, over their police radio.

At 8:15 p.m., Officers Alex Horstein and Donald Eichler separately responded to a "man with a gun" call near 4200 North Kenmore Street, approximately one mile away from the location of the Hawbecker shooting. At the scene, an unidentified man told Officer Eichler that a young blond kid, approximately 18 to 25 years old, had displayed a handgun and caused a commotion. Officer Horstein testified that he heard at least one, and maybe 15 to 20, unidentified bystanders state that Robert Lee was the person with the gun. The officers then left the scene and drove through the area looking for the described person. Both officers stated that they had known defendant for several years prior to this incident and that they were both aware of past complaints of defendant shooting out street lights on Kenmore. Horstein further testified that he remembered that complainants had said defendant was shooting the street lights with a chrome-plated gun that "sounded like a .22." Also, both officers had heard the earlier description of Hawbecker's assailant over their police radios.

At 9:15 p.m., Officer Eichler saw defendant walking near Belmont and Clark Streets, which is approximately 1 1/2 miles from the "man with a gun" location and 1/2 mile from the area where Hawbecker was shot. Based on the "man with a gun" description, he stopped defendant, asked for identification and patted him down, looking for a gun. No weapon was found and defendant was released. Officer Eichler then transmitted the details of the stop over his radio and included defendant's name and address in the radio description. Officer Horstein heard this report on his radio and, at 9:30 p.m., saw defendant walking near Clark and Cornelia Streets but was unable to stop because of traffic. Horstein testified that he recognized defendant because the officer frequently visited a friend who lived in the same building as defendant's mother. Horstein testified that he had seen defendant in that building approximately 30 times during the past six years. Shortly after this 9:30 sighting of defendant, Officers Horstein and Eichler met with other tactical officers and discussed information concerning defendant.

Around 11 p.m., Officer Alotta received a radio call that a man had been shot in an alley off of 1061 West Cornelia, which is a few blocks from the Hawbecker scene and is four blocks from where Officer Horstein had seen defendant at 9:30 p.m. Alotta, who had interviewed Hawbecker in the hospital, responded to this call and spoke briefly with the victim, Peter Larson. Allota then interviewed Deborah Jones who had witnessed the two assailants leaving the scene. Jones told the officer that two people were involved: a male white Hispanic and white male who was 19 years old, very slender and had long blond hair. This information was transmitted over the police radio, whereupon Officer Eichler radioed back that he had stopped defendant a short time before the Larson shooting. Eichler's radio message also stated that the description of one of the Larson assailants matched that of defendant and was also the same description as the Hawbecker shooter and the "man with a gun" report. Eichler also transmitted defendant's name, birthdate, and address. Upon hearing Alotta's message, Officer Horstein continued looking for defendant. Horstein stated that he believed defendant's address to be on Kenmore where defendant lived during the complaints regarding the shooting of street lights.

Larson, a cab driver, testified that he picked up two young men around 11 p.m. One of the men was a Puerto Rican and the other, whom he had a good view of under the cab's interior dome light, was white, about 18 years old, between 5'10"'' and 6' tall with blond shoulder-length hair that was pushed up by the man's coat collar. Larson could not recall any specific facial characteristics, including whether the white male had unusual eyes. Defendant has crossed eyes. Larson also could not describe the assailant's clothing. Upon arriving at their destination, the white male pointed a gun at Larson, announced "This is a stickup," and ordered Larson to drive into a nearby alley. The white male asked Larson for money. Larson took money out of his pocket and gave it to the Puerto Rican who then left the cab. The white male then demanded Larson's wallet and afterwards shot him twice in the back of the head.

Around midnight, Paula Tomas was shot as she sat with a friend in front of her home on West Fletcher Street, approximately one mile from the location of the Larson shooting. Tomas did not see who shot her since there was no one else on the streets at that time. Her friend testified that a light blue car sped by and that he heard a shot and discovered Tomas had been hurt.

After these incidents on January 26, Officers Horstein and Eichler both stated that they continued to search for defendant until their shifts ended. Eichler waited outside defendant's West Buena Place address but did not knock on the door. Horstein testified that he continued to look for defendant for the next three days but that he never went to the building where he knew defendant's mother lived. Around 10 a.m., on January 30, Horstein saw defendant on the street, about four blocks from his home, and made a warrantless arrest for the January 26 shootings.

On the same day as defendant's arrest, Detective Stachula took eight photographs, including defendant's pictures, to Larson who was in the hospital. Larson at that time told Stachula that his eyes were blurry and his frontal vision was affected by recent surgery. Larson stated that he could not identify any facial features and did not want to identify his assailant unless he could be positive.

The next day, January 31, defendant was questioned at the police station by Detective Stachula and Assistant State's Attorney Thomas Epach. Both men were familiar with the police reports concerning the shooting incidents. The police had no information concerning the Hispanic man involved in the Larson shooting, nor had the gun been recovered. Defendant was questioned for over an hour. Initially, he claimed a person who looked just like him shot the three victims and that he observed these events. After Stachula called defendant's mother and learned that defendant was in and out of their apartment that evening, defendant allegedly confessed to the shootings. (Later, at trial, defendant's mother testified that her son was in the apartment all evening except briefly around 10:00 p.m. A family friend similarly testified.)

Since defendant could not read or write very well, Epach wrote the three-page confession. Epach testified that as he asked a question of defendant, he would then write the answer down, changing only a few words. After the confession was completed, Epach then read the entire document to defendant after which defendant signed his name on each page. In his confession, defendant stated that he was a drug addict, that he needed money for drugs, and that he took his silver .22 caliber gun and went out looking for people to rob. He said that he tried to "stick up" Hawbecker on Lakewood, but that as Hawbecker began to reach into his pockets, he shot him. Defendant also stated that prior to the shooting he had hit Hawbecker in the face several times. Defendant then went home and listened to music until approximately 11 p.m. when he went out and met up with a man whose name he did not know. Both men then proceeded to hail a blue and white cab and subsequently robbed Larson in an alley off Lakewood. As to the Tomas shooting, defendant stated that he walked up to the woman and demanded her money. When she became excited, defend...

To continue reading

Request your trial
29 cases
  • People v. Salinas
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • March 31, 2004
    ...the State has failed to carry its burden of proving the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See People v. Lee, 151 Ill.App.3d 510, 531-32, 104 Ill.Dec. 136, 502 N.E.2d 399 (1986)(no corroborating evidence that defendant committed an armed robbery attempt); People v. Lesure, 271 Ill.......
  • People v. Howard
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • December 19, 1991
    ...show the commission of the offense. (Willingham, 89 Ill.2d at 361, 59 Ill.Dec. 917, 432 N.E.2d 861; cf. People v. Lee (1986), 151 Ill.App.3d 510, 531-32, 104 Ill.Dec. 136, 502 N.E.2d 399 (reversing conviction for attempted armed robbery where only evidence of attempt was contained in defend......
  • People v. Rose, 1-87-2645
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • December 6, 1989
    ...not be admissible at trial, and it need not be sufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. (People v. Lee (1986), 151 Ill.App.3d 510, 518, 104 Ill.Dec. 136, 502 N.E.2d 399.) In evaluating the existence of probable cause, courts are required to consider " 'probabilities and are ......
  • People v. Morando
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • April 29, 1988
    ...508, 79 Ill.Dec. 151, 463 N.E.2d 705, cert. denied (1984), 469 U.S. 866, 105 S.Ct. 209, 83 L.Ed.2d 140; People v. Lee (1986), 151 Ill.App.3d 510, 104 Ill.Dec. 136, 502 N.E.2d 399, appeal denied, 112 Ill.2d 564.) However, in Taylor, the slain victim's intoxication was a reason to be uncertai......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT