People v. Leonti
Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
Citation | 248 N.Y.S.2d 1012,20 A.D.2d 899 |
Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph LEONTI, Appellant. |
Decision Date | 06 April 1964 |
Page 1012
v.
Joseph LEONTI, Appellant.
Irving Tenenbaum, Great Neck, L. I., for appellant.
William Cahn, Mineola, Henry P. DeVine and Martin I. Silberg, Mineola, of counsel.
Before BELDOCK, P. J., and UGHETTA, CHRIST, HILL and RABIN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered May 11, 1962 after a jury trial, convicting him [20 A.D.2d 900] of: (a) felony murder in the first degree; (b) murder in the second degree; and (c) arson in the third degree; and sentencing him: (1) upon the jury's recommendation, to a term of life imprisonment on the first-degree murder count; (2) to a concurrent term of 40 years to life imprisonment on the second-degree murder count; and (3) as a prior felony offender, to a term of 10 to 20 years imprisonment on the arson conviction, to run consecutively with the other two counts.
Judgment modified on the law by striking out the provision imposing a sentence of 40 years to life imprisonment on the second-degree murder conviction. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The findings of fact implicit in the jury's verdict are affirmed.
Page 1013
In our opinion, it was improper to impose an additional sentence in respect of the crime of murder in the second degree committed by the same act which resulted in the conviction for murder in the first degree (People v. Goggin, 256 App.Div. 995, 10 N.Y.S.2d 586, affd. 281 N.Y. 611, 22 N.E.2d 174). The instructions to the jury concerning the order in which the jury could consider the various degrees of homicide was correct (People v. Willson, 109 N.Y. 345, 16 N.E. 540; People v. Mussenden, 308 N.Y. 558, 562, 127 N.E.2d 551, 557).
To continue reading
Request your trial- People v. Leonti
-
People v. Moll
...... It is permissible with respect to lesser included offenses to impose sentence to run concurrently with that imposed for the higher offense. That is opposed to the improper practice of imposing sentence on each degree of a crime committed once against the same victim (see People v. Leonti......
- People v. Leonti
- People v. Leonti