People v. Leonti
| Court | New York Court of Appeals |
| Citation | 256 N.Y.S.2d 935,205 N.E.2d 201,15 N.Y.2d 723 |
| Parties | , 205 N.E.2d 201 The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent-Appellant, v. Joseph LEONTI, Appellant-Respondent. |
| Decision Date | 07 January 1965 |
Page 935
v.
Joseph LEONTI, Appellant-Respondent.
Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, 20 A.D.2d 899, 248 N.Y.S.2d 1012.
Defendant was convicted of felony murder in the first degree, murder in the second degree, and arson in the third degree. The Supreme Court, Nassau County, Thomas P. Farley, J., entered judgment, and the defendant appealed.
The Appellate Division modified the judgment on the law by striking out the provision imposing a sentence of 40 years to life imprisonment on the second degree murder conviction and, as so modified, affirmed the judgment.
The defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals.
Irving Tenenbaum, Great Neck, for defendant-appellant-respondent.
Page 936
Determination of the appeal withheld and the case remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings consistent with People v. Huntley, 15 N.Y.2d 72, 255 N.Y.S.2d 838, 204 N.E.2d 179, decided herewith.
All concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Thomas, 68 Civ. 464.
...latter tribunal later amended its remittitur to make clear that the point had been raised and decided. 15 N.Y.2d 724, 256 N.Y.S.2d 936, 205 N.E.2d 201 (Jan. 7, In the Supreme Court, petitioner again briefed and argued his claims under Mapp. The Court concluded, however (after rejecting his ......
-
Mishkin v. State of New York, 49
...affirmed without opinion. 15 N.Y.2d 671, 255 N.Y.S.2d 881, 204 N.E.2d 209 (1964), remittitur amended, 15 N.Y.2d 724, 256 N.Y.S.2d 936, 205 N.E.2d 201 (1965). We noted probable jurisdiction. 380 U.S. 960, 85 S.Ct. 1103, 14 L.Ed.2d 15i. We affirm. Appellant was not prosecuted for anything he ......
-
United States v. One Carton Positive Motion Picture Film
...(1962) 17 A.D.2d 243, 234 N.Y.S.2d 342; (1964) 15 N.Y. 2d 671, 255 N.Y.S.2d 881, 204 N.E.2d 209; (1965) 15 N.Y.2d 724, 256 N.Y.S. 2d 936, 205 N.E.2d 201. The convictions were affirmed by the New York Court of Appeals. On November 8, 1965, 86 S.Ct. 232, the United States Supreme Court agreed......
-
People v. Mishkin
...conviction, expressly rejecting those constitutional arguments (15 N.Y.2d 671, 724, 255 N.Y.S.2d 881, 256 N.Y.S.2d 881, 204 N.E.2d 209, 205 N.E.2d 201) and, on his [20 N.Y.2d 718] further appeal, the Supreme Court also affirmed the conviction (383 U.S. 502, 86 S.Ct. It now appears, in retro......
-
United States v. Thomas
......2): . "In view of the then posture of the law in the State of New York concerning the matter of search and seizure as enunciated in People v. Defore, 242 N.Y. 13 150 N.E. 585 (1926), the question of the adequacy of the search warrant was not pursued to an ultimate finding at the trial ......
-
Mishkin v. State of New York
......' adopted by the New York courts in interpreting § 1141 delimits a narrower class of conduct than that delimited under the Roth definition, People v. Richmond County News, Inc., 9 N.Y.2d 578, 586—587, 216 N.Y.S.2d 369, 175 N.E.2d 681, 685—686 (1961), 4 and thus § 1141, like the statutes in ......
-
United States v. One Carton Positive Motion Picture Film
......People v. Mishkin (1960), 26 Misc.2d 152, 207 N.Y.S.2d 390; (1962) 17 A.D.2d 243, 234 N.Y.S.2d 342; (1964) 15 N.Y. 2d 671, 255 N.Y.S.2d 881, 204 N.E.2d 209; ......
- People v. Mishkin