People v. Lieberman
| Decision Date | 26 June 1979 |
| Citation | 393 N.E.2d 1019,47 N.Y.2d 931,419 N.Y.S.2d 946 |
| Parties | , 393 N.E.2d 1019 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Sidney LIEBERMAN, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The points which appellant's present counsel seeks to argue were not preserved for review by his trial attorney. With respect to the claim that the Special Prosecutor acted in excess of his authority, defendant's omnibus motion made no reference to the point and nothing appears in the moving papers except a passing reference in the reply affidavit. With respect to the speedy trial issue now argued on constitutional grounds, it was not referred to in the notice of motion which mentioned only CPL 30.30. Though defendant's attorney in oral argument on his motion for reargument did at one point refer to defendant's "Constitutional rights to a speedy trial", neither the notice of motion nor the affidavit gave notice of any change in the predicate for the speedy trial motion from CPL 30.30 to constitutional grounds. Under such circumstances, the issues have not been preserved for review (People v. Johnson, 42 N.Y.2d 841, 397 N.Y.S.2d 380, 366 N.E.2d 80; People v. Tutt, 38 N.Y.2d 1011, 384 N.Y.S.2d 444, 348 N.E.2d 920; People v. Adams, 38 N.Y.2d 605, 381 N.Y.S.2d 847, 345 N.E.2d 318).
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Udzinski
......Martin, 50 N.Y.2d 1029, 431 N.Y.S.2d 689, 409 N.E.2d 1363 [Payton error]; People v. Booker, 49 N.Y.2d 989, 429 N.Y.S.2d 168, 406 N.E.2d 1062; People v. Tutt, 38 N.Y.2d 1011, 384 N.Y.S.2d 444, 348 N.E.2d 920 [Miranda error]; People v. Lieberman, 47 N.Y.2d 931, 419 N.Y.S.2d 946, 393 N.E.2d 1019 [violation of constitutional right to speedy trial]. As a matter of Federal constitutional law, state appellate courts may properly decline to review claims of Federal constitutional error on the basis that such claims were not raised in a ......
-
People v. Biggs
...or osmosis, preserve the issue of the impoundment where it was not actually raised as a basis for suppression (see People v Lieberman, 47 N.Y.2d 931, 932; People v Smith, 113 A.D.2d 905, 907; see also People v Carter, 86 N.Y.2d 721, 723; People v Brown, 81 N.Y.2d 798, 799). Defense counsel'......
-
People v. Jones
...N.Y.S.2d 168, 406 N.E.2d 1062 People v. Martin, 50 N.Y.2d 1029, 431 N.Y.S.2d 689, 409 N.E.2d 1363 see, also, People v. Lieberman, 47 N.Y.2d 931, 419 N.Y.S.2d 946, 393 N.E.2d 1019 [speedy For present purposes, subdivision 2 of CPL 470.05 may be further divided into two distinct parts, each w......
-
People v. Biggs
...or osmosis, preserve the issue of the impoundment where it was not actually raised as a basis for suppression (see People v. Lieberman, 47 N.Y.2d 931, 932, 419 N.Y.S.2d 946, 393 N.E.2d 1019 ; People v. Smith, 113 A.D.2d 905, 907, 493 N.Y.S.2d 623 ; see also People v. Carter, 86 N.Y.2d 721, ......