People v. Loewinger

Decision Date15 March 1972
Citation281 N.E.2d 847,30 N.Y.2d 587,330 N.Y.S.2d 801
Parties, 281 N.E.2d 847 PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Robert LOEWINGER, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, 37 A.D.2d 675, 323 N.Y.S.2d 98.

John S. McBride, Monticello, Joel M. Proyect, South Fallsburg, for defendant-appellant.

Louis B. Scheinman, Woodbourne, for respondent.

By a judgment of the County Court, Sullivan County, the defendant was convicted of assault in the third degree and prisoner escape and he appealed.

The Appellate Division affirmed.It held that where defense counsel had not set forth any material omission when questioned concerning what portions of witness' cross-examination remained unfinished, witness' complete testimony at preliminary examination, both direct and cross-examination, was read to jury and defense rejected trial court's offer to strike testimony of deceased witness, mistrial was not warranted because witness was killed in an automobile accident during adjournment and before his cross-examination was concluded.The defendant appealed.

In the Court of Appealsthe defendant asserted that the conduct of investigating officers was unreasonable and illegal, that...

To continue reading

Request your trial

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
9 cases
  • People v. Schiraldi
    • United States
    • New York City Court
    • 5 Diciembre 1977
    ...v. Shapiro, 84 Misc.2d 223, 375 N.Y.S.2d 945; People v. Loewinger, 37 A.D.2d 675, 323 N.Y.S.2d 98, aff'd without opinion 30 N.Y.2d 587, 330 N.Y.S.2d 801, 281 N.E.2d 847). These cases uniformly hold that it must not be presumed that a district attorney or assistant district attorn will divul......
  • People v. Williams
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 14 Julio 1988
    ...entire District Attorney's office disqualified ( see, People v. Loewinger, 37 A.D.2d 675, 676, 323 N.Y.S.2d 98, affd. 30 N.Y.2d 587, 330 N.Y.S.2d 801, 281 N.E.2d 847). Finally, CPL 190.65(3) requires only that a Grand Jury's foreman or acting foreman hand up its indictments to the court, no......
  • People v. Nuzzi
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 21 Mayo 1985
    ...DeFreese, 71 A.D.2d 689, 418 N.Y.S.2d 959; People v. Loewinger, 37 A.D.2d 675, 323 N.Y.S.2d 98, affd. on other grounds, 30 N.Y.2d 587, 330 N.Y.S.2d 801, 281 N.E.2d 847; People v. Cruz, 55 A.D.2d 921, 390 N.Y.S.2d 442; Matter of Fox v. Shapiro, 84 Misc.2d 223, 375 N.Y.S.2d 945. These cases h......
  • Charles L., In re
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 15 Noviembre 1976
    ... ... (People v. Wilkins, 28 N.Y.2d 53, 56, 320 N.Y.S.2d 8, 10, 268 N.E.2d 756, 757.) Any analogy between a private law firm and the district attorney's office is ... (See People v. Washington (Sup.Ct., App.Div.) 383 N.Y.S.2d 422, 423; People v. Loewinger, 37 A.D.2d 675, 323 N.Y.S.2d 98, 100--101, aff'd 30 N.Y.2d 587, 330 N.Y.S.2d 801, 281 N.E.2d 847; State v. Miner, 128 Vt.55,[63 Cal.App.3d 766] 258 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT