People v. Lovett
| Decision Date | 29 January 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. 57413,57413 |
| Citation | 396 Mich. 101,238 N.W.2d 44 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rufus LOVETT, Defendant-Appellant. 396 Mich. 101, 238 N.W.2d 44 |
| Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Raymond P. Walsh, Asst. Pros. Atty., Detroit, for plaintiff-appellee.
M. Arthur Arduin, Detroit, for defendant-appellant; Carl Ziemba, Detroit, of counsel.
Defendant's conviction must be reversed because the trial judge failed to instruct on the lesser included offense of attempted armed robbery despite defense counsel's request. People v. Henry, 395 Mich. 367, 370, 236 N.W.2d 489 (1975); People v. Jones, 395 Mich. 379, 390, 236 N.W.2d 461 (1975).
Defendant was charged with armed robbery. The trial judge instructed on the lesser included offenses of unarmed robbery and larceny from the person. She denied defense counsel's request for an instruction on attempted armed robbery because she found 'no evidence' to support that verdict. The jury convicted the defendant of larceny from the person. The Court of Appeals affirmed the failure to instruct on the lesser included offense of attempted armed robbery because '(t)here was no evidence of anything but a complete crime'. 63 Mich.App. 656, 665, 234 N.W.2d 749, 753 (1975).
In Jones, supra, we said: 'If the lesser offense is one that is necessarily included within the greater, the evidence will always support the lesser if it supports the greater.' 395 Mich. 390, 236 N.W.2d 465. Attempted armed robbery is 'necessarily included' within the offense of armed robbery. People v. Bradovich, 305 Mich. 329, 332, 9 N.W.2d 560 (1943). The jury may have found the defendant guilty of the attempt although the evidence showed a completed offense. M.C.L.A. § 768.32; M.S.A. § 28.1055; People v. Baxter, 245 Mich. 229, 232, 222 N.W. 149 (1928).
In lieu of leave to appeal, we reverse defendant's conviction and remand the cause to Recorder's Court for a new trial. GCR 1963, 853.2(4).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Dietrich
...the Supreme Court held that an instruction on a necessarily lesser included offense must be given upon request. People v. Lovett, 396 Mich. 101, 238 N.W.2d 44 (1976), and People v. Allen, 80 Mich.App. 786, 265 N.W.2d 47 (1978), apply Ora Jones, supra, retroactively. In People v. Crawl, supr......
-
Lightfoot v. State
...N.E.2d 342 (1972); State v. Fox, 159 N.W.2d 492 (Iowa 1968); Commonwealth v. Gosselin, 309 N.E.2d 884 (Mass.1974); People v. Lovett, 396 Mich. 101, 238 N.W.2d 44 (1976); People v. Bradovich, 305 Mich. 329, 9 N.W.2d 560 (1943); People v. Baxter, 245 Mich. 229, 222 N.W. 149 (1928); Hill v. St......
-
People v. Page
...a building as a necessarily included offense to a charge of breaking and entering with intent to commit larceny. 1 In People v. Lovett, 396 Mich. 101, 238 N.W.2d 44 (1976), the Supreme Court reversed a conviction for larceny from the person because the trial court refused to give a requeste......
-
People v. Kamin
...announced new rules of law that should be given prospective effect only. We find that contention without merit. In People v. Lovett, 396 Mich. 101, 238 N.W.2d 44 (1976), without discussing the retroactivity issue, we found Jones/Chamblis error and reversed a conviction entered prior to our ......