People v. Luciano
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Writing for the Court | Before MARTUSCELLO |
| Citation | People v. Luciano, 406 N.Y.S.2d 528, 64 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978) |
| Decision Date | 03 July 1978 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Alejandro LUCIANO, Appellant. |
William E. Hellerstein, New York City (Nancy S. Hobbs, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Eugene Gold, Dist. Atty., Brooklyn (Salvatore S. Russo, New York City, of counsel), for respondent.
Before MARTUSCELLO, J. P., and LATHAM, SHAPIRO and O'CONNOR, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered July 24, 1975, convicting him of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. No issue has been presented with respect to the facts.
At the trial there was testimony that an undercover officer, Michael D. McCann, bought heroin from defendant on two occasions. A back-up team provided security for the officer and subsequently made the arrest. Officer McCann was the only witness who was present during the sale of the narcotics. He described how he met defendant and how defendant sold him packets of heroin on two separate days. Over the objection of defense counsel, the officer was permitted to testify as to what he had reported to members of the back-up team after the sales were made and after the defendant's arrest. That...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
State ex rel. Rudin on Behalf of Bond v. Ward
...statement by the affiant. Accord, People v. Streeter, 67 A.D.2d 877, 413 N.Y.S.2d 690 (1st Dept., 1979); People v. Luciano, 64 A.D.2d 614, 406 N.Y.S.2d 528 (2d Dept. 1978).** In truth, the governor can easily ward off such an attack since even conclusory language is sufficient to "charge" s......
-
People v. Sarmiento
...(People v. Trowbridge, 305 N.Y. 471, 113 N.E.2d 841; see, People v. Candelario, 156 A.D.2d 191, 548 N.Y.S.2d 448; cf., People v. Luciano, 64 A.D.2d 614, 406 N.Y.S.2d 528). This testimony, together with that of the arresting officers who received the description, provides a necessary explana......
-
People v. Candelario
... ... This tends to give the idea to a jury that there is an impressive amount of testimony to identification when such is really not the fact." ... To the extent that People v. Luciano, 64 A.D.2d 614, 406 N.Y.S.2d 528 may be read to exclude Officer Vargas' testimony, we decline to follow it. That case is distinguishable in that the police officer to whom a sale of drugs was made was permitted to testify as to what he had reported to members of the back-up team after the sales ... ...
- People v. Julye