People v. Macy, 90SA9

Decision Date02 April 1990
Docket NumberNo. 90SA9,90SA9
Citation789 P.2d 188
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Complainant, v. Lloyd W. MACY, Attorney-Respondent.
CourtColorado Supreme Court

Linda Donnelly, Disciplinary Counsel, and John Gleason, Asst. Disciplinary Counsel, Denver, for complainant.

Lloyd W. Macy, Northglenn, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

This is an attorney discipline case in which a hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee unanimously recommended that the respondent, Lloyd W. Macy, be suspended from practicing law for two years and be assessed the costs of the proceeding. We accept the panel's recommendation.

A hearing board of the grievance committee heard this matter, and a hearing panel approved the findings and conclusions of the hearing board. Macy elected not to file exceptions to the hearing panel's report. See C.R.C.P. 241.20(b)(2). The hearing board's findings and conclusions were based on the amended complaint, the allegations of which were admitted by Macy; documentary evidence; stipulations of the parties; and Macy's testimony before the hearing board.

I.

Lloyd W. Macy was admitted to the bar of this court on April 5, 1967. He is therefore subject to the jurisdiction of this court and its grievance committee in all matters relating to the practice of law. C.R.C.P. 241.1(b).

In 1986, Charles J. Taylor, who is not a lawyer, approached Macy for advice in connection with Taylor's desire to sell "living trust" packages to customers who wished to use them to avoid taxes or probate. In December of that year, Macy met with Taylor and reviewed a package of "living trust" documents prepared by Taylor for marketing through nonlawyer salespersons.

Taylor began selling "living trust" documents in January 1987. During the next several months, Macy reviewed several "living trust" packages prepared for individuals and answered questions addressed to him by nonlawyer salespersons regarding individual customers' concerns. Taylor paid Macy $75.00 per hour for his services.

II.

Macy's conduct violated two provisions of the Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102(A)(1) (violating a disciplinary rule), and DR 3-101(A) (aiding a nonlawyer in the unauthorized practice of law). Aiding a nonlawyer in the unauthorized practice of law is a violation of a duty owed to the legal profession. See The American Bar Association's Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions (1986) 7.0 ("Standards for Lawyer Discipline "). The creation and sale of trust documents by nonlawyers constitutes the unauthorized practice of law. People v. Schmitt, 126 Colo. 546, 251 P.2d 915 (1952). This court has suspended an attorney in the past for aiding a nonlawyer in marketing trusts to the public. People v. Boyls, 197 Colo. 242, 591 P.2d 1315 (1979).

The Standards for Lawyer Discipline prescribe suspension for this type of conduct when

a lawyer knowingly engages in conduct that is a violation of a duty owed to the profession, and causes injury or potential injury to a client, the public, or the legal system.

Standards for Lawyer Discipline 7.2. The Standards for Lawyer Discipline also suggest certain factors that aggravate or mitigate an attorney's misconduct and therefore increase or decrease the appropriate sanction. Several aggravating factors are present in this case. Macy has a prior disciplinary record, having received a letter of admonition in 1980 and a private censure in 1985. See Standards for Lawyer Discipline 9.22(a). Each was based on neglect in representing a client. Macy has substantial experience in the practice of law. See id. at 9.22(i). The evidence suggests that Macy may have acted out of a selfish desire to generate legal business for himself, rather than simply to receive legal fees from Taylor. See id. at 9.22(b). Macy's conduct...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Mid-America Living Trust Associates, Inc., In re
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • August 20, 1996
    ...also have aided in the illegal practice. Laden, 893 P.2d at 772; Cassidy, 884 P.2d at 311; Volk, 805 P.2d at 1118; People v. Macy, 789 P.2d 188 (Colo.1990). Referral attorneys, as well as in-house attorneys, also have been found to suffer from a conflict of interest. Obviously, an attorney'......
  • People v. Laden, 95SA96
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • April 17, 1995
    ...respondent aided that nonlawyer in the unauthorized practice of law, contrary to DR 3-101(A). Cassidy, 884 P.2d at 311; People v. Macy, 789 P.2d 188, 189 (Colo.1990); People v. Boyls, 197 Colo. 242, 243, 591 P.2d 1315, 1316 The inquiry panel approved the conditional admission, and recommend......
  • People v. Cassidy
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • November 7, 1994
    ...for the McCarter Agency, the respondent aided a nonlawyer in the unauthorized practice of law, contrary to DR 3-101(A). People v. Macy, 789 P.2d 188, 189 (Colo.1990); People v. Boyls, 197 Colo. 242, 243, 591 P.2d 1315, 1316 (1979) (lawyer suspended for one year for aiding nonlawyer "educato......
  • People v. Volk, 90SA234
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • February 25, 1991
    ...This is not the first time that Taylor's living trusts have surfaced in a disciplinary proceeding before this court. See People v. Macy, 789 P.2d 188 (Colo.1990). Between March and October of 1988, the respondent reviewed a number of living trusts for individuals at the request of American ......
5 books & journal articles
  • Cba Ethics Committee Opinion
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 19-9, September 1990
    • Invalid date
    ...126 Colo. 546, 251 P.2d 915 (1952).] The Court has also suspended attorneys for their participation in such ventures. In People v. Macy, 789 P.2d 188 (Colo. 1990), an attorney was suspended for reviewing living trust packages prepared by non-lawyers for individuals, answering questions addr......
  • Cba Ethics Committee Opinion
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 21-2, February 1992
    • Invalid date
    ...126 Colo. 546, 251 P.2d 915 (1952). The Court also has suspended attorneys for their participation in such ventures. In People v. Macy, 789 P.2d 188 (Colo. 1990), an attorney was suspended for reviewing living trust packages prepared by non-lawyers for individuals, answering questions addre......
  • Punishing Ethical Violations: Aggravating and Mitigating Factors
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 20-1, January 1991
    • Invalid date
    ...13. Standards 4.13,4.14. 14. People v. Garrett, 20 Colo.Law. 382 (Feb. 1991) (S.Ct. No. 90SA448, annc'd 12/24/90). 15. People v. Macy, 789 P.2d 188 (Colo. 1990). 16. See, e.g., People v. O'Leary, 783 P.2d 843 (Colo. 1989). 17. 790 P.2d 331 (Colo. 1990). 18. Id. at 332. 19. 19 Colo.Law.. 259......
  • State Bar News
    • United States
    • Utah State Bar Utah Bar Journal No. 10-7, September 1997
    • Invalid date
    ...[18]The Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Assoc, v. Baker, 492 N.W.2d 695 (Iowa, 1992); People v. Macy, 789 P.2d 188 (Colo. 1990); Mich. State Bar, Op. No. RI-191 (Feb. 14, 1993); W. Va. State Bar, Op. 92-03; Ohio Supreme Court, Op. 92-15 (Aug. 14, 1992); Or......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT