People v. Magnotta
Citation | 137 A.D.3d 1303,27 N.Y.S.3d 403 (Mem) |
Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Maurizio MAGNOTTA, appellant. |
Decision Date | 30 March 2016 |
Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
137 A.D.3d 1303
27 N.Y.S.3d 403 (Mem)
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,
v.
Maurizio MAGNOTTA, appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
March 30, 2016.
John P. Savoca, Yorktown Heights, N.Y., for appellant.
Robert Tendy, District Attorney, Carmel, N.Y. (David M. Bishop of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Putnam County (Rooney, J.), rendered December 7, 2011, convicting him of criminal sexual act in the first degree and burglary in the third degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255–256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ).
The defendant's contention that his plea was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent survives his valid appeal waiver (see People v. Fontanet, 126 A.D.3d 723, 2 N.Y.S.3d 371 ). However, the defendant failed to preserve this contention for appellate review, since he did not move to withdraw the plea (see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5 ; People v. Narbonne, 131 A.D.3d 626, 627, 14 N.Y.S.3d 917 ). In any event, the defendant's plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see People v. Fiumefreddo, 82 N.Y.2d 536, 543, 605 N.Y.S.2d 671, 626 N.E.2d 646 ). Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record of the plea proceeding reveals that he was adequately apprised of the constitutional rights forfeited by his plea of guilty (see People v. Pollidore, 123 A.D.3d 1058, 1059, 997 N.Y.S.2d 752 ).
The defendant's contention that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered because the County Court did not adequately inform him of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Ramos
...and intelligent survives his valid appeal waiver (see People v. Smith, 146 A.D.3d at 904, 44 N.Y.S.3d 771 ; People v. Magnotta, 137 A.D.3d 1303, 1303, 27 N.Y.S.3d 403 ). However, the defendant failed to preserve this contention for appellate review, since he did not move to vacate his plea ......
-
People v. Thomas
...of guilty survive his appeal waiver (see People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 10, 543 N.Y.S.2d 968, 541 N.E.2d 1022 ; People v. Magnotta, 137 A.D.3d 1303, 27 N.Y.S.3d 403 ). However, this issue is unpreserved for appellate review, since the defendant did not move to withdraw the plea (see People......
-
People v. Martinez, 2014–11443
...and intelligent survives his valid appeal waiver (see People v. Smith, 146 A.D.3d at 904–905, 44 N.Y.S.3d 771 ; People v. Magnotta, 137 A.D.3d 1303, 27 N.Y.S.3d 403 ). However, contrary to the defendant's contention, his plea of guilty was not coerced by the County Court's remarks informing......
-
People v. Hutter
...contention that his plea was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent survives his valid appeal waiver (see People v. Magnotta, 137 A.D.3d 1303, 27 N.Y.S.3d 403 ). However, the defendant failed to preserve this contention for appellate review, since he did not move to vacate his plea or othe......