People v. Manini
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Writing for the Court | Before CALLAHAN |
| Citation | People v. Manini, 572 N.Y.S.2d 137, 174 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991) |
| Decision Date | 07 June 1991 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Jaime MANINI, Respondent. |
Steven M. Chananie, White Plains, for appellant.
Salvatore Piemonte by James Kousouros, Syracuse, for respondent.
Before CALLAHAN, J.P., and DOERR, BOOMER, GREEN and BALIO, JJ.
County Court properly dismissed counts 37 and 38 of the indictment. The evidence before the Grand Jury was legally insufficient to establish that defendant, while in California, was in constructive possession of cocaine physically possessed by another person in New York or that defendant was liable as an accessory to the possession of cocaine in New York (see, People v. Jennings, 69 N.Y.2d 103, 115, 512 N.Y.S.2d 652, 504 N.E.2d 1079; People v. Patel, 132 A.D.2d 498, 502, 518 N.Y.S.2d 384, amended, 133 A.D.2d 38, 518 N.Y.S.2d 384, lv. denied, 70 N.Y.2d 935, 524 N.Y.S.2d 687, 519 N.E.2d 633; People v. Ballard, 133 Misc.2d 584, 587-589, 507 N.Y.S.2d 572).
Order unanimously affirmed.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
People v. Manini
...we apply are the same in both cases, but the significantly different factual scenarios require an affirmance in People v. Manini, 174 A.D.2d 978, 572 N.Y.S.2d 137, and a reversal in People v. Fuente, 170 A.D.2d 986, 566 N.Y.S.2d The indictments in both cases resulted from investigations of ......
-
People v. Manini
...949 574 N.Y.S.2d 949 78 N.Y.2d 969, 580 N.E.2d 421 People v. Manini (Jaime) Court of Appeals of New York Aug 16, 1991 Simons, J. 174 A.D.2d 978, 572 N.Y.S.2d 137 App.Div. 4, Onondaga Granted ...