People v. Martinez
| Decision Date | 26 April 2001 |
| Docket Number | No. 98CA2518.,98CA2518. |
| Citation | 36 P.3d 154 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Lee MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
32 cases
-
State v. Kooyman
...and consistent rejection of his overtures. Thus, the evidence was relevant to refute Kooyman's consent defense. Cf. State v. Martinez, 36 P.3d 154, 159 (Colo.Ct.App.2001) (stating that refuting a consent defense is a valid purpose to admit prior bad act evidence under rule 404(b)); see also......
-
People v. Jones
...district court must perform a Rule 404(b) admissibility analysis. People v. Snyder, 874 P.2d 1076, 1078 (Colo.1994); People v. Martinez, 36 P.3d 154, 158–59 (Colo.App.2001). The court must determine that (1) the evidence relates to a material fact; (2) the evidence is logically relevant; (3......
-
People v. Woellhaf, No. 00CA2351.
...not and did not receive more than one sentence for each single offense. Thus, the charges were not multiplicitous. See People v. Martinez, 36 P.3d 154 (Colo.App.2001)(defendant correctly charged with two counts of second degree sexual assault on the same victim on the same day when the offe......
-
People v. Davis
...the trial court's admission of evidence for an abuse of discretion. People v. Rath, 44 P.3d 1033, 1043 (Colo.2002); People v. Martinez, 36 P.3d 154, 158 (Colo.App.2001). We will not disturb the trial court's ruling unless it is manifestly arbitrary, unreasonable, or unfair. See Rath, 44 P.3......
Request a trial to view additional results