People v. Maxwell, Docket No. 9315

Decision Date28 September 1971
Docket NumberDocket No. 9315,No. 1,1
Citation36 Mich.App. 127,193 N.W.2d 176
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant
CourtCourt of Appeal of Michigan — District of US

Charles Burke, Detroit, for defendant-appellant.

Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Derengoski, Sol. Gen., William L. Cahalan, Pros. Atty., Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Div., Gerard A. Poehlman, Asst. Pros. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before DANHOF, P.J., and McGREGOR and QUINN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was tried and convicted of assault with intent to rob being armed. M.C.L.A. § 750.89 (Stat.Ann.1962 Rev. § 28.284). He was sentenced to life imprisonment.

On appeal he claims reversible error occurred because the trial judge did not Sua sponte instruct on lesser included offenses. There was no evidence on the record to support an instruction on lesser included offenses and the court did not affirmatively exclude the jury from considering lesser included offenses. No reversible error occurred. People v. Membres (1971), 34 Mich.App. 224, 191 N.W.2d 66 and People v. Busby (1971), 34 Mich.App. 235, 191 N.W.2d 70. Additionally, the crime of attempted assault with intent to rob does not exist. People v. Patskan (1971), 29 Mich.App. 354, 185 N.W.2d 398.

The trial court did not err in sentencing the defendant to life imprisonment without specifying a minimum term. Elliott v. Michigan Department of Corrections (1955), 343 Mich. 681, 73 N.W.2d 298; M.C.L.A. § 750.89 (Stat.Ann.1962 Rev. § 28.284); and M.C.L.A. § 769.9 (Stat.Ann.1971 Cum.Supp. § 28.1081).

The jury instruction on specific intent was proper.

No argument or formal submission is necessary because the questions sought to be reviewed are so unsubstantial.

The motion to affirm is granted.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • People v. Jones
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • 27 Julio 1993
    ...which by definition would include an attempt to attempt or offer." 29 Mich.App. at 357, 185 N.W.2d 398. See also People v. Maxwell, 36 Mich.App. 127, 193 N.W.2d 176 (1971); People v. Banks, 51 Mich.App. 685, 216 N.W.2d 461 (1974); People v. Matulonis, 60 Mich.App. 143, 230 N.W.2d 347 (1975)......
  • People v. McGuire
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • 22 Marzo 1972
    ...v. Goldfarb, 37 Mich.App. 57, 194 N.W.2d 535 (1971); People v. Wilkie, 36 Mich.App. 607, 194 N.W.2d 154 (1971); People v. Maxwell, 36 Mich.App. 127, 193 N.W.2d 176 (1971). VI. Did the Prosecutor and Judge Commit Error in Failing to Show that Defendant had not been in Prison Despite Testimon......
  • People v. Jones
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • 6 Abril 1992
    ...attempt to attempt or offer. See People v. Richard Banks, 51 Mich.App. 685, 216 N.W.2d 461 (1974), and People v. [193 MICHAPP 553] Maxwell, 36 Mich.App. 127, 128, 193 N.W.2d 176 (1971). Subsequently, in People v. Joeseype Johnson, 407 Mich. 196, 284 N.W.2d 718 (1979), our Supreme Court broa......
  • People v. Roshinsky
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • 20 Enero 1972
    ...lesser included offenses from the consideration of the jury by stating "There are no included offenses." See, e.g., People v. Maxwell, 36 Mich.App. 127, 193 N.W.2d 176 (1971); People v. Busby, 34 Mich.App. 235, 191 N.W.2d 70 (1971); People v. Brown,32 Mich.App. 262, 188 N.W.2d 666 (1971); P......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT