People v. McConnell
Decision Date | 15 December 1983 |
Docket Number | No. 71642,71642 |
Citation | People v. McConnell, 341 N.W.2d 433, 418 Mich. 881 (Mich. 1983) |
Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Howard McCONNELL, Defendant-Appellant. 418 Mich. 881, 341 N.W.2d 433 |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
ORDER
Case below;122 Mich.App. 208, 332 N.W.2d 408.
On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal is considered and, pursuant to GCR 1963, 853.2(4), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REMAND the case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of People v. Kreiner, 415 Mich. 372, 329 N.W.2d 716(1982).
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
People v. Adams
...391 Mich. 419, 216 N.W.2d 780 (1974); People v. McConnell, 122 Mich.App. 208, 332 N.W.2d 408 (1982), vacated on other grounds 418 Mich. 881, 341 N.W.2d 433 (1983). Reasoning that a separate count of perjury was available if deemed appropriate, and that use of this criterion is improper unde......
-
People v. Mazzie
...analysis, the Court of Appeals in People v. McConnell, 122 Mich.App. 208, 332 N.W.2d 408 (1982), vacated on other grounds 418 Mich. 881, 341 N.W.2d 433 (1983), found that the trial judge had erred in increasing defendant's minimum sentence because of his impression that the defendant had li......
- People v. Potts