People v. McCray
| Decision Date | 09 November 1981 |
| Citation | 444 N.Y.S.2d 972,84 A.D.2d 769 |
| Parties | People v. McCray (Michael) NO. 2071 E |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
2nd Dept.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
McCray v. Abrams
... ... In support of this contention, McCray pointed out that "[t]here have been seven black people and one Hispanic ven[ire]man up to this point. [The prosecutor] has challenged each and every one of them. Of her eleven challenges, she has used eight to challenge blacks and Hispanics." (Transcript of hearing dated April 24, 1980, at 5.) McCray requested a hearing at which the prosecutor ... ...
-
People v. Guzman
...Limiting The Peremptory Challenge: Representation Of Groups On Petit Juries, 86 Yale Law Journal 1715, 1716 (1977); People v. McCray, 84 A.D.2d 769, 444 N.Y.S.2d 972, aff'd. 57 N.Y.2d 542, 457 N.Y.S.2d 441, 443 N.E.2d 915 (1982); cert. denied McCray v. New York, 416 U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 243......
-
McCray v. Abrams
... ... He accused the prosecutor of systematically excluding blacks and Hispanics from the jury, and noted that one of the blacks so excluded had stated during voir dire that a relative or close friend was a victim of a crime. According to the trial court's opinion denying these motions, People v. McCray, 104 Misc.2d 782, 429 N.Y. S.2d 158, 159 (N.Y.Sup.Ct., Kings Co.1980), the prosecutor denied excusing jurors on the ground of race. The trial court denied defendant's motion, on the same ground, to set aside the verdict, and the Appellate Division affirmed, 84 A.D.2d 769, 444 N.Y. S.2d ... ...
- Fiorillo v. Karel