People v. McIntyre
| Decision Date | 10 December 1987 |
| Citation | 135 A.D.2d 920,522 N.Y.S.2d 688 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kirkland McINTYRE, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Richard Allen Rothermel, Otsego County Public Defender, Oneonta, for appellant.
Paul W. Elkan, Otsego County Dist. Atty., Cooperstown, Linden D. Summers, III, for respondent.
Before KANE, J.P., and MAIN, MIKOLL, YESAWICH and HARVEY, JJ.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Otsego County (Mogavero, Jr., J.), rendered November 17, 1986, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of two counts of the crime of forgery in the second degree.
In April 1986, defendant was indicted for seven counts of the crime of forgery in the second degree. Defendant subsequently pleaded guilty to two counts of the indictment in full satisfaction of the charges against him. As part of the plea bargain, it was agreed that defendant would receive a term of imprisonment of 1 to 3 years on the first count and a concurrent term of five years' probation on the second count. Defendant was sentenced in compliance with the agreement. He has served a term of imprisonment and is currently on parole. On this appeal, defendant challenges the validity of the sentence of probation.
When a court sentences a defendant for more than one crime and one of the crimes is a felony for which a sentence of imprisonment in excess of six months is imposed, it cannot also sentence him to a term of probation for another crime (Penal Law § 65.00[1][b]; § 60.01[2][d]; see, People v. Bucci, 122 A.D.2d 562, 505 N.Y.S.2d 291; Hechtman, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons.Laws of N.Y., Book 39, Penal Law § 65.00, at 168-169). Here, defendant received a sentence of 1 to 3 years' imprisonment for his plea of guilty to one count of the crime of forgery in the second degree, a class D felony. He also received...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Furnia
...81 N.Y.2d 870, 597 N.Y.S.2d 928, 613 N.E.2d 960; People v. Cerilli, 80 N.Y.2d 1016, 592 N.Y.S.2d 660, 607 N.E.2d 807; People v. McIntyre, 135 A.D.2d 920, 522 N.Y.S.2d 688). Accordingly, that part of the sentence ordering probation must be vacated (see, People v. Sibley, supra, at 871, 597 N......
-
People v. Latzen
...(see, People v. Jackson, 144 A.D.2d 1031, 534 N.Y.S.2d 300; People v. Curkendall, 141 A.D.2d 891, 529 N.Y.S.2d 402; People v. McIntyre, 135 A.D.2d 920, 522 N.Y.S.2d 688). Thus, County Court had no power to sentence him to continued probation on the violation of probation charge (see, People......
-
People v. O'Brien
...was illegal (see, Penal Law §§ 60.01[2][d], 65.00; see also, People v. Curkendall, 141 A.D.2d 891, 529 N.Y.S.2d 402; People v. McIntyre, 135 A.D.2d 920, 522 N.Y.S.2d 688). Defendant's sentence is therefore modified by vacating the provision imposing probation (see, People v. Jackson, 144 A.......
-
People v. Cerilli
...there are precedents for this principle from the Appellate Divisions in the Third and Fourth Departments (see, e.g., People v. McIntyre, 135 A.D.2d 920, 522 N.Y.S.2d 688; People v. Curkendall, 141 A.D.2d 891, 529 N.Y.S.2d 402; People v. Jackson, 144 A.D.2d 1031, 534 N.Y.S.2d 300), these cas......