People v. Medeiros
| Decision Date | 30 June 1993 |
| Docket Number | No. 1-91-0669,1-91-0669 |
| Citation | 249 Ill.App.3d 139,618 N.E.2d 1065 |
| Parties | , 188 Ill.Dec. 495 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas MEDEIROS, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | United States Appellate Court of Illinois |
David P. Sterba, Orland Park, for defendant-appellant.
Jack O'Malley, State's Atty. of Cook County, Chicago (Renee Goldfarb, Donald T. Lyman and Bennett E. Kaplan, Assistant State's Attys., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.
After a jury trial, defendant Thomas Medeiros was convicted of first degree murder in violation of section 9-1(a)(1) of the Criminal Code of 1961 () Judgment was entered on the verdict and defendant was sentenced to serve a term of 22 years' imprisonment. It is from the judgment of conviction that defendant now appeals to this court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 603. 134 Ill.2d R. 603.
On appeal, defendant argues that: (1) he was denied a fair trial as a result of the cumulative impact of allegedly improper and prejudicial remarks made by the prosecution during closing argument; and (2) he was not proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
For the reasons which follow, we affirm.
One fact in this case remains uncontroverted: On September 21, 1989, Kenny Wayne was shot dead by a bullet fired from defendant's revolver. The State maintains that defendant killed Wayne while being involved in a drug deal that went awry. Defendant asserts that Wayne was accidentally shot by a stray bullet fired while he was in the process of attempting to make a lawful arrest of another individual, while off-duty from his responsibilities as a Marrionette Park police officer.
Before addressing defendant's assertion that he was denied a fair trial due to the allegedly improper prosecutorial remarks, we must address the State's contention that defendant has waived review of these complained-of remarks. Speaking to this issue, the Illinois Supreme Court has held that absent plain error, "[b]oth a trial objection and a written post-trial motion raising the issue are required for alleged errors that could have been raised during trial." (Emphasis in original.) (People v. Enoch (1988), 122 Ill.2d 176, 186, 119 Ill.Dec. 265, 522 N.E.2d 1124, cert. denied, (1988), 488 U.S. 917, 109 S.Ct. 274, 102 L.Ed.2d 263; see also People v. Nevitt (1990), 135 Ill.2d 423, 441, 142 Ill.Dec. 854, 553 N.E.2d 368; People v. Adams (1985), 109 Ill.2d 102, 116, 92 Ill.Dec. 528, 485 N.E.2d 339, cert. denied, (1986), 475 U.S. 1088, 106 S.Ct. 1476, 89 L.Ed.2d 730.) Furthermore, it is not sufficient to merely refer to a cited error in a post-trial motion as "prejudicial," "inflammatory" or "erroneous" without factual detail is inadequate to preserve an issue on appeal. People v. Phillips (1989), 186 Ill.App.3d 668, 682, 134 Ill.Dec. 468, 542 N.E.2d 814; People v. Pendelton (1989), 185 Ill.App.3d 768, 777, 134 Ill.Dec. 207, 542 N.E.2d 386; People v. David (1986), 141 Ill.App.3d 243, 261, 95 Ill.Dec. 396, 489 N.E.2d 1124.
With respect to the prosecutor's allegedly improper remarks, we find that defendant has waived this issue. In his post-trial motion, defendant merely states that "[t]he Defendant was prejudiced and deprived of a fair trial as the result of improper and inflammatory and arguments made by the State before the jury." We find this general averment of error to be woefully inadequate to sufficiently apprise the trial court of the cited error and, therefore, the issue is deemed waived. David, 141 Ill.App.3d at 261, 95 Ill.Dec. 396, 489 N.E.2d 1124.
We now turn to the greater issue of whether defendant was proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. After a careful review of the evidence presented at trial and the record on appeal, we conclude that there is more than...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Juarez
... ... Vargas witnessed defendant point the gun and shoot in the direction of a moving vehicle, knowing that the vehicle was occupied. It is within the province of the trier-of-fact to determine the weight and credibility of each witnesses' testimony. (People v. Medeiros (1993), 249 Ill.App.3d 139, 188 Ill.Dec. 495, 618 N.E.2d 1065.) The trial judge, in this instance, found the testimonies of the witnesses credible ... In addition, the trial judge found the officer's testimony significant, since he was a law enforcement agent as well as an ... ...
-
People v. Thomas
... ... Enoch (1988), 122 Ill.2d 176, 186, 119 Ill.Dec. 265, 522 N.E.2d 1124; see also People v. Carlson (1980), 79 Ill.2d 564, 576, 38 Ill.Dec. 809, 404 N.E.2d 233.) Moreover, it is insufficient to merely refer to a cited error in a post-trial motion without factual detail. (People v. Medeiros (1993), 249 Ill.App.3d 139, 140, 188 Ill.Dec. 495, 618 N.E.2d 1065.) Specific objections are required to ensure that the trial court was adequately apprised of the cited error. Medeiros, 249 Ill.App.3d at 140, 188 Ill.Dec. 495, 618 N.E.2d 1065 citing People v. David (1986), 141 Ill.App.3d 243, ... ...
-
People v. Webb
... ... We agree ... "Speaking to this issue, the Illinois Supreme Court has held that absent plain error, '[b]oth a trial objection and a written post-trial motion raising the issue are required for alleged errors that could have been raised during trial.' " (People v. Medeiros (1993), 249 Ill.App.3d 139, 140, 188 Ill.Dec. 495, 618 N.E.2d 1065 quoting People v ... [205 Ill.Dec. 10] Enoch (1988), 122 Ill.2d 176, 186, 119 Ill.Dec. 265, 522 N.E.2d 1124.) In this case, defendant did not raise the issue in his post-trial motion. In fact, defendant, through his trial ... ...
-
People v. Martinez, 1-91-2903
... ... While defendant's version of the story is quite different, it is the jury's function to determine the credibility of witnesses and resolve conflicts. (People v. Medeiros (1993), 249 Ill.App.3d 139, 141, 188 Ill.Dec. 495, 618 N.E.2d 1065.) In the case sub judice, the evidence can in no way be said to be unreasonable, improbable or unsatisfactory and, accordingly, we find no reasonable doubt of defendant's guilt ... Defendant's final argument is ... ...