People v. Megown

Decision Date24 September 2018
Docket NumberD072019
CitationPeople v. Megown, 28 Cal.App.5th 157, 238 Cal.Rptr.3d 911 (Cal. App. 2018)
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeals
Parties The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Kevin MEGOWN, Defendant and Appellant.

Certified for Partial Publication.*

John E. Edwards, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General, Melissa Mandel and Mary K. Strickland, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

NARES, Acting P. J.Kevin Megown beat Michelle R., the mother of his child. After one incident where Michelle's mother, Maria R., came to aid her, Megown threatened to kill both of them as he held a gun. A jury convicted Megown of violating a domestic violence restraining order ( Pen. Code, § 273.6, subd. (a) ), possessing an assault weapon ( Pen. Code, § 30605, subd. (a) ), and inflicting corporal injury on a cohabitant ( Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a) ). It also found true allegations that he inflicted great bodily injury ( Pen. Code, § 1192.7, subd. (c)(8) ) in circumstances involving domestic violence ( Pen. Code, § 12022.7, subd. (e) ). The jury also acquitted on some counts and could not reach a verdict on several others. Megown was retried on some of the unresolved counts.

A second jury convicted Megown of inflicting corporal injury on a cohabitant ( Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a) ), three counts each of criminal threats ( Pen. Code, § 422 ) and assault with a semiautomatic firearm ( Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (b) ). The jury also found true allegations that Megown personally used a firearm ( Pen. Code, §§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(8), 12022.5, subd. (a) ). The trial court sentenced Megown to a total term of 17 years in prison.

Megown claims the trial court erred by: (1) admitting past uncharged acts of domestic violence under Evidence Code section 1109 with respect to the counts involving Maria, (2) admitting evidence of abuse that occurred more than 10 years before the charged crimes, (3) giving CALCRIM No. 875 (assault with a firearm) without modification, and (4) failing to stay the sentence on one of the criminal threats counts under Penal Code section 654. He also claims that the abstract of judgment should be amended to accurately reflect the trial court's oral pronouncement and that the cumulative effect of the above errors require reversal. In a supplemental brief, Megown argues that the matter must be remanded to the trial court so it may exercise its discretion in determining whether to strike the firearm enhancements.

In the published portion of this opinion, part I, we conclude the trial court did not err in admitting uncharged crimes evidence under Evidence Code section 1109 with respect to the counts involving Maria because the circumstances of these crimes involved domestic violence. We also conclude that the trial court did not err in admitting evidence of abuse that occurred more than 10 years before the charged crimes.

In the unpublished portions of our opinion, parts II through VI, we conclude that: (1) the trial court erred when it failed to stay the sentence on one of the criminal threats counts under Penal Code section 654, (2) the abstract of judgment should be corrected, and (3) the matter must be remanded to the trial court to exercise its discretion in determining whether to strike the firearm enhancements. We reject Megown's remaining arguments.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Megown and Michelle started dating in 1998. They had a child together in 2010 and began living together in 2012. Over the course of her 16-year relationship with Megown, Michelle estimated that he became physically violent with her about 10 times each year. Lauren A. lived next door to the couple from 2013 until approximately 2016. She recalled hearing Michelle yell about Megown not being at home and not being engaged with the couple's son. On three or four occasions she heard Megown yell that he was going to kill Michelle. She remembered three incidents when she heard a commotion at the couple's home, like furniture moving and something being thrown against furniture.

2014 Incident Against Michelle—Count 1

On a day in March 2014 the couple argued about Michelle's claims that Megown did not spend time with their son, did not provide financial support, and had sex with prostitutes he met online. The argument turned physical when Megown grabbed Michelle by her neck with both hands and forced her to the floor. Megown told her that he was going to kill her, that he hated her, and that she was a "cunt." Eventually, Michelle lost consciousness. She later went to the hospital due to her painful injuries. She lied to the hospital staff about the cause of her injuries, claiming that a stranger had grabbed her by the neck. The examining doctor concluded that Michelle's injuries were consistent with strangulation.

2015 Incident Against Michelle—Counts 9 to 11

On a day in July 2015 Megown and Michelle argued because she had spent the day at Comic Con. Megown became enraged, told her "I'm going to kill you," grabbed her, and slammed her into a wall. He put both of his hands around her neck and pinned her against the wall as he continued to say he would kill her and that he hated her. Megown punched Michelle in the face and in the back of her head several times. He also kicked her in her lower back and hips as he told her that he wanted to kill her. Michelle was "very afraid."

Megown picked Michelle up and threw her against a door, knocking her unconscious. When Michelle regained consciousness, Megown was dragging her across the floor while stating, "I'm going to fucking kill you. I'm going to kill you. I fucking hate you." When Michelle attempted to flee, Megown grabbed her by the neck and slammed her onto the couch. Eventually, Michelle dropped to the floor. Michelle then heard clicking and knew that Megown had retrieved his gun. Megown pointed the gun at her stating that he was going to kill her and that, as Michelle looked toward the door, "If that door moves I'm putting a round through you." Megown's finger was on the trigger—something he had told Michelle to do only when ready to shoot. With the gun pointed at Michelle's head he repeated, "I'm going to kill you."

When Megown finally walked away, Michelle called Maria for help. She did not call the police because Megown had told her over the years that if she called the police he would claim she attacked him, that she was a bad mother, and that her son would be taken away.

2015 Incident Against Michelle and Maria—Counts 12 to 15 and 17

When Maria arrived she confronted Megown and asked him what he had done. Megown retrieved his gun and pointed it at Maria's head with his finger on the trigger. Megown said, "Fuck you, you fucking cunt, I'll kill you." He then alternated pointing the gun at each victim's forehead. Megown stated that he was going to kill both Michelle and Maria as he did this. The women fled when Megown went into the bedroom, but they did not call the police because Megown had threatened to kill them if they did. Although Maria wanted to call the police, Michelle told her that she would not talk to the police because she was afraid of Megown and afraid for her son. Michelle took photographs of her injuries.

Disobeying Court Order—Count 18

In August 2015 Michelle obtained a restraining order against Megown. He was served with the order the same day. The order specified that Megown was not to go to the couple's shared home. About an hour after being served with the order, Megown drove to their home. Michelle and Maria locked themselves inside the house and barricaded the door. Michelle called 911 as Megown attempted to force his way into the house. Megown fled when Michelle yelled that the police were on their way.

Prior Unreported and Uncharged Incidents of Domestic Violence

At trial, the prosecutor asked Michelle about five prior instances of domestic violence that were not charged in the case. In 2004 an argument turned physical when Megown threw her on a futon, pinned her down and eventually grabbed her neck. In 2007 Megown threw a full water bottle at Michelle while the couple argued about his drinking. When Michelle started yelling, Megown threw her to the floor, pinned her down with his knee on her back and struck her twice. In 2008 Michelle got upset when Megown's father came into the couple's hotel room intoxicated. While arguing, Megown threw her against the wall, onto the bed and then the floor. In 2012, while arguing about finances, Megown grabbed Michelle by the neck, shook her and told her to shut up. Finally, in 2013 the couple argued about his drinking as they left a baseball game. Megown grabbed Michelle's throat and pinned her against the car window until she lost consciousness.

Defense Evidence

Megown was not asked about, or did not remember, the uncharged incidents relayed by Michelle. Nonetheless, he admitted that there were times when he and Michelle became physical during arguments. On the day of the 2015 charged incidents, Megown remembered arguing with Michelle about Comic Con. Megown claimed that Maria came over carrying a machete and that he barricaded himself in the bedroom. He denied drawing a gun on Michelle or Maria and claimed that he never threatened to kill Michelle and Maria that evening. When asked whether he had ever threatened to kill Michelle, Megown responded, "Never."

Megown admitted that he and Michelle got physical with each other during arguments. He also admitted that he went to the couple's joint home after being served with the restraining order to retrieve his belongings thinking that Michelle would not be there. When he tried to unlock the front door, Michelle and Maria started yelling at him. He left and drove to a police station.

DISCUSSION

I. ALLEGED EVIDENTIARY ERROR
A. Additional Background

The prosecution filed a pretrial motion seeking to introduce Megown's prior...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
63 cases
  • People v. Wang
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • March 24, 2020
    ...‘in a criminal action in which the defendant is accused of an offense involving domestic violence.’ " ( People v. Megown (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 157, 166, 238 Cal.Rptr.3d 911.) To "involve" commonly means " ‘to include, contain, or comprehend within itself or its scope.’ " ( Ibid . ) Thus, be......
  • People v. Clark
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • April 5, 2021
    ...criminal act itself. ( People v. Cage (2015) 62 Cal.4th 256, 274, 195 Cal.Rptr.3d 724, 362 P.3d 376 ; People v. Megown (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 157, 166, 238 Cal.Rptr.3d 911 ( Megown ).)Defendants assert that seeking to prove the motive to discard the gun was improper because it did not relate......
  • People v. Lapenias
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • July 29, 2021
    ...italics added.) Evidence is not "prejudicial" merely because it is harmful to a criminal defendant's case. ( People v. Megown (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 157, 164, 238 Cal.Rptr.3d 911.) Indeed, essentially all relevant evidence introduced by the prosecution is likely to be harmful to a defendant'......
  • People v. Bishop
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • June 30, 2021
    ...to the constraints of section 352. (See § 1109, subd. (d)(2)-(3); Fam. Code, § 6211; Wang, supra, 46 Cal.App.5th at p. 1077; Megown, supra, 28 Cal.App.5th at p. 166; People v. Ogle, supra, 185 Cal.App.4th at p. 1144; People v. Dallas, supra, 165 Cal.App.4th at p. 953.) b. Incidents Involvin......
  • Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases null
    • United States
    • Full Court Press California Guide to Criminal Evidence Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...§3.4.1(2)(c) People v. Medina, 11 Cal. 4th 694, 47 Cal. Rptr. 2d 165, 906 P.2d 2 (1995)—Ch. 4-C, §2.5.2(2)(c)[1] People v. Megown, 28 Cal. App. 5th 157, 238 Cal. Rptr. 3d 911 (4th Dist. 2018)—Ch. 4-A, §3.5.1(2) People v. Melendez, 2 Cal. 5th 1, 211 Cal. Rptr. 3d 49, 384 P.3d 1202 (Cal. 2016......
  • Table of cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books California Objections
    • March 29, 2023
    ...3d 17, §20:80 Meeks v. AutoZone (2018) 24 Cal. App. 5th 855, 235 Cal. Rptr. 3d 161, §§9:30, 11:10, 14:30 Megown, People v. (2018) 28 Cal. App. 5th 157, 238 Cal. Rptr. 3d 911, §11:10 Mehserle, People v. (2012) 206 Cal. App. 4th 1125, 142 Cal. Rptr. 3d 423, §10:200 Melaleuca, Inc. v. Clark (1......
  • Chapter 4 - §3. Character evidence offered to prove propensity
    • United States
    • Full Court Press California Guide to Criminal Evidence Chapter 4 Statutory Limits on Particular Evidence
    • Invalid date
    ...propensity in prosecution for kidnapping, battery, and dissuading current girlfriend as a witness); People v. Megown (4th Dist.2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 157, 166 (past uncharged acts of domestic violence by D on his cohabitant girlfriend were admitted to prove crimes against her mother; charged ......
  • Character and habit
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books California Objections
    • March 29, 2023
    ...(2022) 74 Cal. App. 5th 343, 366, 289 Cal. Rptr. 3d 452. • Assault on third person in presence of cohabitant. People v. Megown (2018) 28 Cal. App. 5th 157, 166, 238 Cal. Rptr. 3d 911. CHARACTER & HABIT 11-9 Character and Habit §11:10 Although §1109 contemplates that the propensity evidence ......
  • Get Started for Free