People v. Minjares

Decision Date25 May 1979
Docket NumberCr. 20549
CitationPeople v. Minjares, 24 Cal.3d 410, 153 Cal.Rptr. 224, 591 P.2d 514 (Cal. 1979)
Partiesw 24 Cal.3d 410, 591 P.2d 514 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Paul Michael MINJARES, Defendant and Appellant.
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
82 cases
  • People v. Laiwa
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • July 29, 1981
    ...exceptions. (Mincey v. Arizona (1978) 437 U.S. 385, 390, 98 S.Ct. 2408, 2412, 57 L.Ed.2d 290; People v. Minjares (1979) 24 Cal.3d 410, 416, 153 Cal.Rptr. 224, 591 P.2d 514.) Moreover, if a warrantless search is to be upheld, it is the People's burden to show that the search falls within one......
  • People v. Carney
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • September 8, 1983
    ...290, quoting Katz v. United States (1967) 389 U.S. 347, 357, 88 S.Ct. 507, 514, 19 L.Ed.2d 576; accord, People v. Minjares, supra, 24 Cal.3d at p. 416, 153 Cal.Rptr. 224, 591 P.2d 514.) It is against this background that we examine defendant's challenge to the warrantless search of the livi......
  • People v. Cardenas
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • March 23, 1982
    ......." (People v. Dalton, supra, 24 Cal.3d 850, 855-856, 157 Cal.Rptr. 497, 598 P.2d 467; italics added; People v. Minjares, 24 Cal.3d 410, 153 Cal.Rptr. 224, 591 P.2d 414; see also Robbins v. California, supra, 453 U.S. 420, 101 S.Ct. 2841, 69 L.Ed.2d According to dicta 1 in Dalton and Minj......
  • People v. Flores
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • December 21, 1979
    ...police. (See People v. Dalton (1979) 24 Cal.3d 850, 157 Cal.Rptr. 497, 598 P.2d 467 (closed metal boxes); People v. Minjares (1979) 24 Cal.3d 410, 153 Cal.Rptr. 224, 591 P.2d 514 (zippered tote bag) (cert. den. ---U.S. ----, 100 S.Ct. 181, 62 L.Ed.2d 117).) Under such circumstances that cou......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Appendix E
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books California Drunk Driving Law - Volume 1-2 Appendices
    • March 30, 2022
    ...is over two decades old. APPENDIX E UNPUBLISHED CASE DIGEST E-267 California Drunk Driving Law’s Unpublished Case Digest Minjares (1979) 24 Cal.3d 410, 424, 153 Cal.Rptr. 224, 591 P.2d 514; Chambers v. Maroney (1970) 399 U.S. 42, 53, 90 S.Ct. 1975, 26 L.Ed.2d 419.) There must be proof “beyo......