People v. Mitchell
Decision Date | 10 April 1894 |
Citation | 142 N.Y. 639 |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. CALEB W. MITCHELL, Respondent. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from supreme court, general term, third department.
Caleb W. Mitchell was convicted of keeping gambling house.The people appeal from a judgment of the general term (21 N. Y. Supp. 166) reversing such conviction.Appeal dismissed.
T. F. Hamilton, for the People.
J. S. L'Amoreaux, for respondent.
The defendant was charged with keeping a gambling house, and was found guilty by the jury, and sentenced to pay a fine of $500.Upon appeal from the judgment of conviction, it was reversed on the facts by the general term, and the discharge of the prisoner ordered.The people then appealed to this court.The appeal, however, should be dismissed.The power to review the facts ended with the action of the general term, and they have exercised it by ordering a reversal of the conviction, placing their order expressly upon the facts, and not upon the law.The appeal presents no exception, and this court, sitting only for the correction...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
People v. Mackell
...courts which reversed and dismissed indictments and informations. (People v. Kuland, 266 N.Y. 1, 3, 193 N.E. 439, 440; People v. Mitchell, 142 N.Y. 639, 36 N.E. 1051.) However, the sounder and more well-established principle was that an order reversing and dismissing an indictment though re......
-
People v. Calabur
...by the Court of Appeals. People v. O'Brien, 164 N. Y. 57, 58 N. E. 117;People v. Grossman, 168 N. Y. 47, 60 N. E. 1050;People v. Mitchell, 142 N. Y. 639, 36 N. E. 1051;People v. Stevens, 104 N. Y. 667, 10 N. E. 527;People v. Conroy, 97 N. Y. 62;People v. Boas, 92 N. Y. 560;Harris v. Burdett......
- Rabe v. Consolidated Ice Co.
- People v. Underhill